California's landmark climate legislation, AB 32, ends in five years; i.e., the target year for emissions reduction is 2020, after which there will be no comparable legislation targeting a future year. SB 32 sets emission reduction goals for 2050.
"The principal author of [the 2006 climate legislation, AB 32], Sen. Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, has introduced a new bill, SB 32, requiring greenhouse gases to be cut to 80 percent below the 1990 levels by 2050," writes John Howard, editor of Capitol Weekly. "The plan would come under the jurisdiction of the [California] Air Resources Board [CARB]."
California will have met the goals of AB 32 if by 2020 emissions are no greater than 1990 levels. Setting the target at 80 percent below 1990 will clearly be a tough row to hoe, "all but certain to draw national attention," writes Howard. It would "authorize state air quality regulators to establish interim benchmarks in 2030 and 2040 to make sure the reductions are actually taking place."
"The lack of post-2020 certainties has been cited as a restraining factor on investments in several areas of the [cap-and-trade] program, such as speculative participation by major financial institutions, and offset project activity for which returns are cast over a long-term horizon," according to CaliforniaCarbon.
Asked if Gov. Jerry Brown has taken a position on the bill, his spokesman stated, “While we generally do not comment on pending legislation, we continue to support strong, sustained action on climate change."
The bill's target is the same as 2005 Executive Order [S-3-05] issued by then-Governor Schwarzenegger who also signed AB 32. That executive order was also referenced in a successful lawsuit on the environmental impact report (EIR) on the sustainable communities strategy of the San Diego Association of Governments' (SANDAG), a requirement under SB 375.
Addendum:
- Regarding AB 32, Howard notes that "(t)he final law carried the name of then-Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez, although Pavley was its original author.
- SB 1125, detailed by Planetizen in a February 2014 post, "Successor Bill to California's Landmark Climate Change Legislation Introduced," was not approved by the State Legislature.
Read the full story: Major new cuts eyed for greenhouse gases
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
‘Going backwards:’ Baltimore mayor, students rally against state's transit funding plan
Maryland's proposed six-year plan provides no funding for Baltimore’s BMORE bus program and reduces its road maintenance funding.
Mamdani sent nearly 6,000 pied-à-terre tax warnings to homes that didn’t qualify
A judge has ordered the administration to cancel thousands of pied-à-terre tax notices after it sent 35% of them erroneously.
Newsom vetoes high-speed rail supervision bill after agency receives condemnatory audit
The audit found the CHSRA approved almost $600,000 in unallowable travel expenses.
Nation sees first electric plane-boat hybrid take off in public demo
The Viceroy Seaglider can fly at speeds of 180mph for up to 180 miles.
One of nation’s poorest counties to receive $6 billion data center
The developers estimate the project will create 200 permanent jobs and 1,000 temporary construction jobs.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Thousand Oaks
City of Wisconsin Rapids
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA)
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello