The California High Speed Rail Project is a political pawn in a contentious back and forth between the Golden State and the Trump administration.

"The Trump administration made good Thursday on its threat to cancel nearly $1 billion in federal funds for California’s high-speed rail project, saying the state has “abandoned” its original plan for San Francisco-to-Los Angeles service in favor of a truncated line in the Central Valley," report Tal Kopan and John Wildermuth.
The Trump administration is making good on a threat to rescind the funding after California Governor Gavin Newsom spoke in his first state-of-state address about the need to reconsider the plan for the massive project. Gov. Newsom suggested focusing on the initial phase of the project between Bakersfield and Merced, the Federal Railroad Administration said that $928.6 million awarded to the project was dependent on the construction of the full, San Francisco to Los Angeles route.
"What’s more, it added, construction delays mean the state hasn’t complied with conditions for federal funding 'and has failed to make reasonable progress on the project,'" according to Kopan and Wildermuth.
California High Speed Rail Authority officials are quoted in the article saying the Trump administration decision will not kill the project. "The system has $9 billion from Proposition 1A, which voters approved in 2008; $2.55 billion in federal money that’s already been spent; and $500 million to $750 million a year in state cap-and-trade funds from air quality protection efforts," according to the article.
A separate article by Ralph Vartabedian and Stuart Leavenworth on the Trump administration's actions notes that in addition to rescinding the $929-million grant for project construction, the Federal Railroad Administration could still decide to force the state to reimburse "$2.5 billion in another grant that the state already has spent."
FULL STORY: Trump administration cancels California’s high-speed rail funding

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Map: Where Senate Republicans Want to Sell Your Public Lands
For public land advocates, the Senate Republicans’ proposal to sell millions of acres of public land in the West is “the biggest fight of their careers.”

Restaurant Patios Were a Pandemic Win — Why Were They so Hard to Keep?
Social distancing requirements and changes in travel patterns prompted cities to pilot new uses for street and sidewalk space. Then it got complicated.

Platform Pilsner: Vancouver Transit Agency Releases... a Beer?
TransLink will receive a portion of every sale of the four-pack.

Toronto Weighs Cheaper Transit, Parking Hikes for Major Events
Special event rates would take effect during large festivals, sports games and concerts to ‘discourage driving, manage congestion and free up space for transit.”

Berlin to Consider Car-Free Zone Larger Than Manhattan
The area bound by the 22-mile Ringbahn would still allow 12 uses of a private automobile per year per person, and several other exemptions.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
JM Goldson LLC
Custer County Colorado
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Claremont
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)