The California High Speed Rail Project is a political pawn in a contentious back and forth between the Golden State and the Trump administration.

"The Trump administration made good Thursday on its threat to cancel nearly $1 billion in federal funds for California’s high-speed rail project, saying the state has “abandoned” its original plan for San Francisco-to-Los Angeles service in favor of a truncated line in the Central Valley," report Tal Kopan and John Wildermuth.
The Trump administration is making good on a threat to rescind the funding after California Governor Gavin Newsom spoke in his first state-of-state address about the need to reconsider the plan for the massive project. Gov. Newsom suggested focusing on the initial phase of the project between Bakersfield and Merced, the Federal Railroad Administration said that $928.6 million awarded to the project was dependent on the construction of the full, San Francisco to Los Angeles route.
"What’s more, it added, construction delays mean the state hasn’t complied with conditions for federal funding 'and has failed to make reasonable progress on the project,'" according to Kopan and Wildermuth.
California High Speed Rail Authority officials are quoted in the article saying the Trump administration decision will not kill the project. "The system has $9 billion from Proposition 1A, which voters approved in 2008; $2.55 billion in federal money that’s already been spent; and $500 million to $750 million a year in state cap-and-trade funds from air quality protection efforts," according to the article.
A separate article by Ralph Vartabedian and Stuart Leavenworth on the Trump administration's actions notes that in addition to rescinding the $929-million grant for project construction, the Federal Railroad Administration could still decide to force the state to reimburse "$2.5 billion in another grant that the state already has spent."
FULL STORY: Trump administration cancels California’s high-speed rail funding

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)