The San Francisco-to-Los Angeles bullet train may have to be renamed the Central Valley High-Speed Train according to the announcement by the new governor in his first state-of-the-state address.
The California High-Speed Rail Authority broke ground in Fresno on Jan. 6, 2015 in what was thought to be the nation's first high-speed rail project. On Feb. 12, the project appears to have been dramatically downsized by Gov. Jerry Brown's successor, Gavin Newsom.
"Let’s be real. The current project, as planned, would cost too much and respectfully take too long. There’s been too little oversight and not enough transparency," Newsom said in his first State of the State Address to lawmakers on Tuesday.
"Newsom said the state will complete a 119-mile (191 km) high-speed rail link between Merced [pop. 83,000] and Bakersfield [pop. 380,000] in the state’s Central Valley," reports David Shepardson for Reuters.
“Abandoning high-speed rail entirely means we will have wasted billions and billions of dollars with nothing but broken promises, partially filled commitments and lawsuits to show for it. And by the way, I am not interested in sending $3.5 billion in federal funding that was allocated to this project back to Donald Trump."
A state audit issued in November said California’s High‑Speed Rail Authority’s “flawed decision making and poor contract management have contributed to billions in cost overruns and delays.”
"Several news outlets have already interpreted his remarks to mean he wants to scale the project back to just the Central Valley, where construction has already begun and there are clear plans to complete the first segment," writes Curry.
But that’s not what he said. He pledged to finish the environmental work on Phase 1 of the program–which would connect San Francisco to Anaheim–and continue to pursue federal funding to complete the entire project.
Whether a "Central Valley-only" high-speed train is viable remains to be seen. But what is clear is what the new governor said: “I’m not interested in making the same old mistakes."
The Green New Deal, introduced on Feb. 7 as House Resolution 109, calls for "overhauling transportation systems in the United States to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector as much as is technologically feasible, including through investment in—
(i) "zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and manufacturing;(ii) "clean, affordable, and accessible public transit; and(iii) "high-speed rail;"
According to a press briefing document prepared by the two primary sponsors, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), the proposal would "build out highspeed rail at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary."
It was that last note that caused U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Republicans to note "the project’s demise, tweeting that 'the plug gets pulled on the frequently delayed, over-budget San Francisco-LA (high-speed rail) project. Reality: 1, #GreenNewDeal: 0,'” adds Shepardson for Reuters.
The implications for rail travel of H.Res. 109 are included in a post on Monday, "Updated: What the Green New Deal Means for Planning."
Preemption of Green Cities in Red States
State legislatures, frequently acting on behalf of corporate interests, are preempting local reforms and regulations necessary to limit the emissions that cause climate change.
Democratic Legislators Obstruct Funding for California High Speed Rail
Voters approved a $9.9 billion bond for the California High Speed Rail project in 2008. State legislators would like that money to be spent in other ways in 2021.
Why Tech-Utopian City Plans Fail
Like others before him, e-commerce billionaire Marc Lore wants to build the ideal city from scratch. Urban experts don't have much faith in his chances.
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.