Trump Open to Hiking Gas Tax to Fund Infrastructure Package

Like so many of the president's assertions, the statement, made in a Bloomberg interview on Monday morning, could be open to interpretation, but he's gone where none of his predecessors since Bill Clinton on the issue of raising the gas tax.

3 minute read

May 3, 2017, 10:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


Low Gas Prices

kabby / Shutterstock

When the issue of raising gas taxes arose at the start of the previous administration, President Obama made it clear that he would oppose raising the 18.4 cent per gallon federal gas tax, not increased since 1993 by President Bill Clinton. It violated his pledge not to raise taxes on the middle class.

While his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, repeated that pledge, candidate Trump did not. In fact, as Politifact acknowledges, "15 of the 17 GOP candidates had signed no-tax-hike pledges - not just the middle class but everyone." Jeb Bush and Donald Trump were the exceptions.

Damian Paletta, White House economic policy reporter for The Washington Post, reports on the May 1 Bloomberg interview on the issue of hiking the gas tax.

“It’s something that I would certainly consider” [emphasis added], Bloomberg quoted Trump as saying. The president added that he would be inclined to back the idea “if we earmarked money toward the highways.”

Paletta adds that the context of the remark was funding Trump's much touted $1 trillion infrastructure plan, few details of which have been released.

Aides have said the package would be financed by roughly $200 billion in federal money, with the rest coming from private financing. But Trump has also suggested that he could back a plan that received only federal support.

Heretofore, "federal support" meant general fund transfers which would would either be offset, or added to the growing federal deficit. Private funding has been widely interpreted to mean that user fees, such as tolls, would have to be charged, which would rule out many projects, such as rural roads.

Hiking fuel taxes to pay for infrastructure would allow for public financing without need to offset or add to the deficit, and provides an alternative, or supplement to "tax credits for developers," which Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has stated he would not support.

Polling in January showed that "66 percent of those surveyed said they oppose a plan that would grant close to $140 billion in tax credits to investors who put their money into roads, bridges and transit in return for the right to impose tolls." However, that poll didn't ask how respondents would view increasing gas taxes to pay for those investments.

In the interview, Trump pointed to support by truckers' groups for raising fuel taxes (yes, even diesel taxes) provided funds are used for road infrastructure.

Trump released a one-page tax plan on April 26 that was silent on a gas tax, write the Bloomberg reporters who conducted the interview. They add:

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Monday afternoon that Trump isn’t specifically supporting an increase -- but the president is keeping an open mind about it “out of respect” for trucking-industry interests who Spicer said support an increase as a way to pay for needed road improvements.

Perhaps all this "consideration" was merely throwing a bone to the trucking industry, who are known to be staunch opponents of road tolls?

Monday, May 1, 2017 in The Washington Post - Wonkblog

Large blank mall building with only two cars in large parking lot.

Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House

If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.

April 18, 2024 - Central Penn Business Journal

Rendering of wildlife crossing over 101 freeway in Los Angeles County.

World's Largest Wildlife Overpass In the Works in Los Angeles County

Caltrans will soon close half of the 101 Freeway in order to continue construction of the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing near Agoura Hills in Los Angeles County.

April 15, 2024 - LAist

Workers putting down asphalt on road.

U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause

A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.

April 18, 2024 - Los Angeles Times

Close-up of hand holding up wooden thermometer in front of blurred street

New Forecasting Tool Aims to Reduce Heat-Related Deaths

Two federal agencies launched a new, easy-to-use, color-coded heat warning system that combines meteorological and medical risk factors.

34 minutes ago - Associated Press via Portland Press Herald

View of Dallas city skyline with moderately busy freeway in foreground at twilight.

AI Traffic Management Comes to Dallas-Fort Worth

Several Texas cities are using an AI-powered platform called NoTraffic to help manage traffic signals to increase safety and improve traffic flow.

1 hour ago - Dallas Morning News

View from back of BART Police SUV driving down street in San Francisco, California.

Podcast: Addressing the Root Causes of Transit Violence

Deploying transit police is a short-term fix. How can transit agencies build sustainable safety efforts?

2 hours ago - Streetsblog USA

News from HUD User

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Call for Speakers

Mpact Transit + Community

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.