A Washington Post/ABC News poll released Jan. 17 showed the exact opposite result of a Reuters/Ipsos poll released two days later on the financing for President Trump's $1 trillion infrastructure plan. However, the polls took different approaches.
The headline of The Washington Post article, "Most Americans don’t want new tolls to pay for road and bridge improvements, poll says," only asked one question on infrastructure.
The poll, conducted by telephone Jan. 12-15, 2017, asked respondents how they felt about private companies taking tax credits and allowing them to charge tolls in exchange for building roads and bridges. Furthermore, there was only one infrastructure question among the 46 questions that dealt with presidents Trump, Obama and other issues:
There is a proposal to offer nearly 140 billion dollars in tax cuts for private companies if they pay to build new roads, bridges and transportation projects. The companies then could charge tolls for people to use these roads, bridges and transportation. Do you support or oppose this proposal?
More accurate was how reported the finding for The Washington Post:
In [the] Washington Post-ABC News poll, 66 percent of those surveyed said they oppose a plan that would grant close to $140 billion in tax credits to investors who put their money into roads, bridges and transit in return for the right to impose tolls.
Why combine the two issues in one question? Why not ask about either tax credits or tolls?
While details of the infrastructure plan have yet to be released, "prior to the election, Donald J. Trump proposed giving private investors an 82 percent tax credit to put money into projects, credits that theoretically would reduce their need to profit from the investment," write Halsey III and Clement.
But even with tax credit incentives, investors are unlikely to put their money into projects that don’t provide a revenue stream, most likely in the form of tolls on roads and bridges.
====================================================================================================
The Reuters-Ipsos poll, conducted Dec. 16 – Jan. 12, released Jan. 19, took a different approach. Respondents were asked about three alternative options to finance Trump's infrastructure plan:
Do you agree/disagree with the following:
- I am willing to pay higher taxes to help invest in infrastructure in the U.S.
- 39.1% agreed
- 51.4% disagreed
- 9.5% unsure
- It is ok for the federal government to take on more debt to pay for infrastructure improvements
- 32.9% agreed
- 56.1% disagreed
- 11.0% unsure
- I am willing to pay tolls and user-fees to fund infrastructure improvements
- 50.1% agreed
- 41.4% disagreed
- 8.5% unsure
The result of the simpler and more comprehensive Reuters/Ipsos poll is quite clear: When offered three competing options to finance the trillion dollar infrastructure plan, tolls and user fees are most preferred, followed by higher taxes. The least favorite is debt-financing.
Hat tip to AASHTO Journal.
FULL STORY: Dr. Gridlock: Most Americans don’t want new tolls to pay for road and bridge improvements, poll says
Draft of the Trump Infrastructure Planned Leaked
For those who have spent the last year or so waiting on the edge of their seats in speculation about the contents of President Trump's promised infrastructure plan, there is finally some indication of what the future holds.
Congressional Hearing Addresses Transportation Funding Problem
Transportation for America recaps the first meeting in three years by the House Ways and Means Committee to address transportation funding. Chairman Paul Ryan decried the $63 billion bailout of the Highway Trust Fund but ruled out a gas tax hike.
Pelosi-Schumer-Trump Infrastructure Plan Already Meeting Resistance
Introduced on April 30, the $2 trillion conceptual plan is likely to be dismissed by Congressional Republicans wary of increasing taxes and adding to the deficit, according to an extensive article by The Hill published three days later.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.
The Tiny, Adorable $7,000 Car Turning Japan Onto EVs
The single seat Mibot charges from a regular plug as quickly as an iPad, and is about half the price of an average EV.
Seattle's Plan for Adopting Driverless Cars
Equity, safety, accessibility and affordability are front of mind as the city prepares for robotaxis and other autonomous vehicles.
As Trump Phases Out FEMA, Is It Time to Flee the Floodplains?
With less federal funding available for disaster relief efforts, the need to relocate at-risk communities is more urgent than ever.
With Protected Lanes, 460% More People Commute by Bike
For those needing more ammo, more data proving what we already knew is here.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)