Poll Appears to Show Opposition to Toll Financing for Trump Infrastructure Plan

A Washington Post/ABC News poll released Jan. 17 showed the exact opposite result of a Reuters/Ipsos poll released two days later on the financing for President Trump's $1 trillion infrastructure plan. However, the polls took different approaches.

2 minute read

January 26, 2017, 11:00 AM PST

By Irvin Dawid


Bay Bridge Toll

Ann Baldwin / Shutterstock

The headline of The Washington Post article, "Most Americans don’t want new tolls to pay for road and bridge improvements, poll says," only asked one question on infrastructure.

The poll, conducted by telephone Jan. 12-15, 2017, asked respondents how they felt about private companies taking tax credits and allowing them to charge tolls in exchange for building roads and bridges. Furthermore, there was only one infrastructure question among the 46 questions that dealt with presidents Trump, Obama and other issues:

There is a proposal to offer nearly 140 billion dollars in tax cuts for private companies if they pay to build new roads, bridges and transportation projects. The companies then could charge tolls for people to use these roads, bridges and transportation. Do you support or oppose this proposal?

More accurate was how  reported the finding for The Washington Post:

In [the] Washington Post-ABC News poll, 66 percent of those surveyed said they oppose a plan that would grant close to $140 billion in tax credits to investors who put their money into roads, bridges and transit in return for the right to impose tolls.

Why combine the two issues in one question? Why not ask about either tax credits or tolls?

While details of the infrastructure plan have yet to be released, "prior to the election, Donald J. Trump proposed giving private investors an 82 percent tax credit to put money into projects, credits that theoretically would reduce their need to profit from the investment," write Halsey III and Clement.

But even with tax credit incentives, investors are unlikely to put their money into projects that don’t provide a revenue stream, most likely in the form of tolls on roads and bridges.

====================================================================================================

The Reuters-Ipsos poll, conducted Dec. 16 – Jan. 12, released Jan. 19, took a different approach. Respondents were asked about three alternative options to finance Trump's infrastructure plan:

Do you agree/disagree with the following:

  1.  I am willing to pay higher taxes to help invest in infrastructure in the U.S. 
    • 39.1% agreed
    • 51.4% disagreed
    •  9.5% unsure
  2. It is ok for the federal government to take on more debt to pay for infrastructure improvements
    • 32.9% agreed
    • 56.1% disagreed
    • 11.0% unsure
  3. I am willing to pay tolls and user-fees to fund infrastructure improvements 
    • 50.1% agreed
    • 41.4% disagreed
    •  8.5% unsure

The result of the simpler and more comprehensive Reuters/Ipsos poll is quite clear: When offered three competing options to finance the trillion dollar infrastructure plan, tolls and user fees are most preferred, followed by higher taxes. The least favorite is debt-financing.

Hat tip to AASHTO Journal.

Tuesday, January 17, 2017 in The Washington Post

courses user

As someone new to the planning field, Planetizen has been the perfect host guiding me into planning and our complex modern challenges. Corey D, Transportation Planner

As someone new to the planning field, Planetizen has been the perfect host guiding me into planning and our complex modern challenges.

Corey D, Transportation Planner

Ready to give your planning career a boost?

MARTA train tracks run in the middle of a six lane highway with an overpass and the Buckhead city skyline of skyscrapers in the background.

How Would Project 2025 Affect America’s Transportation System?

Long story short, it would — and not in a good way.

September 29, 2024 - Marcelo Remond

People in large plaza in front of Zurich Opera House in Switzerland.

But... Europe

European cities and nations tend to have less violent crime than the United States. Is government social welfare spending the magic bullet that explains this difference?

September 26, 2024 - Michael Lewyn

Aerial view of low-rise neighborhood in Los Angeles, California.

California Law Ends Road Widening Mandates

Housing developers will no longer be required to dedicate land to roadway widening, which could significantly reduce the cost of construction and support more housing units.

September 25, 2024 - Streetsblog California

Desert tortoise on asphalt road.

California Room to Roam Act Prioritizes Wildlife Connectivity

A new state law requires new development and infrastructure to minimize disruption to local wildlife habitats and migration patterns.

October 4 - Center for Biological Diversity

Victorian Flavel House mansion in Astoria, Oregon.

Oregon Releases Historic Preservation Plan for Next Decade

A plan from the state’s State Historic Preservation Commission outlines priorities for preserving Oregon’s cultural and historic resources.

October 4 - KTVZ

Rendering of Interstate 35 cap park over sunken freeway in Austin, Texas.

Austin’s Vision for I-35 Cap Parks Takes Final Shape

The city’s plan includes parks, entertainment pavilions, commercial space, sports fields, and other facilities over 30 acres of deck parks spanning a sunken Interstate 35.

October 4 - KUT

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research

Regional Rail at Mpact Transit + Community 2024

Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)

Cornell's Department of City and Regional Planning Announces Undergraduate and Graduate Program Information Sessions and Application Details

Cornell University's College of Architecture, Art, and Planning (AAP), the Department of City and Regional Planning (CRP)