Trump plans to authorize $137 billion in tax credits to private construction companies to build projects with tolls and other future cash streams to them to spur building and the economy.

In a campaign that has generated a great deal of talk about the importance of rebuilding American infrastructure, some have criticized GOP candidate, Donald Trump, for not providing specifics. On October 27 with less than two weeks left in the campaign, the Trump team released a document entitled "Trump Versus Clinton on Infrastructure" that fills in some of those details.
In his article for the Washington Post, Jim Tankersley, points out that this type of plan would not be in keeping with traditional conservative views. The document makes a Keynesian argument about the economic benefits of pumping government money into the economy, suggesting that the building boom that would follow would be a boon to the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, some on the left have expressed concerns about privatizing a trillion dollars-worth of American roads and bridges.
For their part, Wilbur Ross and Peter Navarro (the Trump advisors who authored the plan) suggest that it provides a best- of-both-worlds approach. Tankersley reports that they, "Calculate the added tax revenue would be enough to pay for the total cost of the tax credits."
However, Tankersley found that economists dispute this assessment, writing, "Alan Cole, an economist at the Independent Tax Foundation, said the proposal likely overrates the amount of tax revenue that would be generated by the private spending, partly because it appears to assume that every worker on the infrastructure projects was not working — or paying income taxes — previously."
FULL STORY: Donald Trump believes the United States can get $1 trillion in new roads — for free

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.

In These Cities, Most New Housing is Under 441 Square Feet
With loosened restrictions on “micro-housing,” tiny units now make up as much as 66% of newly constructed housing.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)