Journalist Kathleen Sharp, whose great-grandfather worked on the transcontinental railroad, draws comparisons between that epic achievement and the construction of California's high speed rail in this New York Times op-ed.
Depending on one's perspective, California's mega-project is either a symbol of the best of what government can do for its citizens, or a boondoggle of unprecedented scale. Since opponents have made it clear where they stand, particularly in the courts, Sharp offers a fresh and historical perspective from the pro side of the argument.
"In 1869, after years of delays and cost overruns, the transcontinental railroad was finally completed," writes Sharp. "It was the last missing link connecting the American West to the Eastern Seaboard, and a cross-country trip that had once taken six months was cut to around a week...and is considered to be one of the greatest technological feats of the 19th century."
Now, almost 150 years later, the high-speed bullet train aims to hit a similar goal. Last month, officials broke ground on the system that will eventually link San Diego to San Francisco, and tie the California coast on the west (where most travelers live) to the Central Valley in the east (where the tracks lie).
Sharp then acknowledges the projects critics and challenges, from residents who view it a boondoggle to Congress, which has passed legislation, sponsored by a Californian (from the Central Valley, no less, which stands the most to gain from construction jobs) to deny the mega-project any additional federal funds.
But bigger than the train’s cost and potential payoff is what it symbolizes. Nowhere else in the country can you find such bold, stubborn faith in the idea that government can actually do something for its citizens. It’s as if, after the long recession and a punishing drought, hope is stirring again in the Golden State.
Sharp ends by writing "what the transcontinental railroad was to its century, the bullet train can be to ours." Well, for Californians, at least.
Read the full story: 150 Years of Working on the Railroad
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority