After Keystone Delay, Enviros Challenge Other Pipelines

After successfully stalling the Keystone XL pipeline that would transport tar sands crude from Alberta to Gulf area refineries, environmental activists are targeting other proposed pipelines, although the result may be more crude-by-rail shipments.

2 minute read

December 15, 2014, 6:00 AM PST

By Irvin Dawid


"Using Keystone XL as a template, national environmental groups are joining with local activists in a strategy aimed at prolonging government reviews of proposed pipeline routes and their environmental impact," writes Amy Harder who reports on energy policy for The Wall Street Journal.

As a result, six oil and natural-gas pipeline projects in North America costing a proposed $15 billion or more and stretching more than 3,400 miles have been delayed, a tally by The Wall Street Journal shows. 

One delayed pipeline is the $6 billion Northern Gateway that was rejected by the British Columbia government in May 2013. Delays result in mounting costs, similar to the "1,169-mile stretch of the Keystone XL still being reviewed by the Obama administration (that) will cost about $10 billion, or roughly twice the original estimate, according to TransCanada President and Chief Executive Russ Girling," writes Harder.

Harder points to the 59-41 vote on Nov. 18 in the U.S. Senate opposing construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, long delayed by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) but allowed at the behest of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) who was in the midst of a reelection runoff (that she would lose on Dec. 6). The defeat for the controversial pipeline was a huge victory for Keystone foes that may not last long with the new Republican majority Senate in the 114th Congress.

But is delaying construction of pipelines the best for the environment when it comes to transporting oil? 

Delays are adding to the push to move oil by rail, said Robert Johnston, chief executive of Eurasia Group, an independent political-analysis firm. Oil-carrying trains are considered less safe than pipelines by many analysts and government officials.

While oil pipeline leaks have resulted in destructive oil spills including two reported here and here, there have been no fiery explosions and loss of human life as there have been with oil train derailments, the most serious being in July 2013 in Lac Mégantic, Quebec.

As noted here in February, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz himself stated "pipelines are a much safer way to transport oil."

Tuesday, December 9, 2014 in The Wall Street Journal

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

October 28, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A car drives through a puddle, making a large splash. Rain pours down.

California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour

If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.

October 28, 2026 - Grist

Lake Powell with much of the water evaporated.

Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River

Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.

October 30, 2026 - Yale Environment 360

People vote in Chicago behind blue privacy screens

Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners

Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents

November 5 - Block Club Chicago

Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks into a microphone. He wears a gray suit.

NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting

New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.

November 5 - The City Reporter

People in Los Angeles going to the polls, following a sign with an "I Voted" design

California appears to reject Prop. 45

The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.

November 5 - Cal Matters