In cities big and small, the tide is turning against sprawling parking lots, car-centric development, and minimum parking mandates.
American cities, designed for decades to accommodate private cars, are starting to see the benefits of reducing the amount of land used for parking and supporting other transportation modes.
According to an article by Jane Margolies in The New York Times, “The United States has about two billion parking spots, according to some estimates — nearly seven for every car. In some cities, as much as 14 percent of land area is covered with the black asphalt that engulfs malls, apartment buildings and commercial strips.” But today, as housing costs rise, housing supply fails to keep up with demand, and the negative impacts of sprawl and carbon emissions are more broadly understood, minimum parking requirements—mandates that dictate how much parking a developer must provide for a project based on the project’s use, and that often call for more parking than actually needed—are being revised or eliminated in cities and states around the country. Shifting work patterns are also reducing the need for parking in some areas, making it a good time for cities to evaluate the need for parking mandates.
Margolies outlines the history of off-street parking in the U.S., which correlates with the rise of private car ownership. “In the postwar period, when Americans were in thrall with the automobile and the federal government unfurled highways across the land, parking minimums were enshrined in zoning codes to ensure that Americans would always find a paved parallelogram waiting for them at the end of their trip.” Margolies explains that these mandates were not based on any real calculation of need, but became enshrined in the zoning codes of most cities.
Aside from promoting car ownership and inducing sprawl, parking requirements also drive up the cost of development. “Even a basic, stand-alone parking structure costs nearly $28,000 per spot on average, not including land, said Rob McConnell, a vice president at WGI, an engineering firm.” Parking reform advocates like University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) professor Donald Shoup have spent decades arguing that parking policy has a major impact on housing and transportation costs, urban design, mobility, walkability, and quality of life.
Margolies highlights the success of the first major U.S. parking reform program in Buffalo, New York, where “A 2021 study revealed that after the repeal, new major developments overall had 21 percent fewer spaces than the minimum parking mandates would have required.” Other reforms followed at local and state levels, signaling a growing movement to reimagine how parking fits into cities.
FULL STORY: Awash in Asphalt, Cities Rethink Their Parking Needs
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
5 New England states march closer to 800 megawatt wind energy project
Securing federal approval for the project may be complicated under the Trump administration, which has historically been hostile towards domestic wind power.
Baltimore to break ground on $50 million Transit Priority Project
The project will bring faster bus trips, safer streets and better bike connections to Baltimore.
Airbnb launches $250 million 'last-dollar financing' housing accelerator, makes first investment in Austin
The company will put $6.4 million towards affordable housing development in Texas’ capital.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association