Demographic data from the California Department of Finance released last month shows a third consecutive year of population loss, mirroring Census data. Los Angeles and Santa Clara counties saw the highest numeric losses.
“California’s population declined 0.54% to [39,028,571] people, a loss of over 210,000 people,” reported Roland Li and Yuri Avila for the San Francisco Chronicle on January 26.
A sharp decrease in migration to California and roughly 100,000 total coronavirus pandemic deaths led to statewide population drops for the first time in a century, starting in 2020.
San Francisco, and the entire Bay Area, lost population during the second year of the pandemic, and California’s population continued to fall for the third year in a row, according to state estimates [PDF] released Thursday.
Comparison With Census Data
The population estimate is remarkably similar (difference is <1,000 people) to what the U.S. Census Bureau had reported in December, posted here, although the Census put the loss much lower, at 0.29 percent.
California had a population of 39,029,342 on July 1, 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Vintage 2022 national and state population estimates and components of change released Dec. 22, 2022.
[Planetizen exclusive: U.S. Population Growing Again in 2022 After Flatlining in 2021, Dec. 27, 2022]
Bay Area Population Loss
“The nine-county Bay Area saw some of the steepest population declines in the state — ranging from Napa’s loss of about 1,800 people to Santa Clara’s loss of over 16,500 people, second only to Los Angeles County’s 113,000-person plunge in the state,” add Li and Avila.
What's notable according to the table titled, “Population change by Bay Area county, 2021-22,” is that San Francisco's population loss of 4,400 people or 0.5percent during that period, down significantly from the prior year, was the lowest, percentage-wise, for the 9-county region. Marin, the region's second least populous county, led with a loss of 1.5 percent, followed by Napa (least populous) and San Mateo counties, with declines of 1.3 percent and 1.1 percent, respectively.
Chief Reason for Population Loss Remains Unchanged
While the numbers may fluctuate a bit from year to year, the chief cause of the population loss is remarkably consistent, note Li and Avila.
San Francisco’s, and the Bay Area’s, losses were driven by a net domestic migration [sic], as many residents left the region and state for cheaper housing options.
Related in Planetizen:
- California Continues its Losing Streak, January 3, 2023
- Five Takeaways From California’s 2022 Demographic Changes, January 1, 2023
- Two Demographic Firsts, Both Losses, for California, May 10, 2021
Read the full story: S.F. population falls to lowest level in over a decade after second year of the pandemic
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority