The incoming chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), points to gubernatorial races and a California ballot initiative to show there's no peril for legislators to hike the gas tax.
"Rep. Peter DeFazio, an Oregon Democrat expected to head the committee when his party takes over the House of Representatives in January, told MarketWatch that this month’s midterm elections showed raising [state] gasoline taxes isn’t a political third rail, and that it’s 'something we can work on' with President Donald Trump as Washington tries to fashion an infrastructure package," reports Robert Schroeder.
Infrastructure is back in the spotlight after the midterms, with Democrats, Trump and Republican leaders all expressing interest. But paying for improvements and new projects will be the “hangup,” according to incoming House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, a California Republican.
But this last election demonstrated there’s no “political peril” for lawmakers who would raise the gasoline tax if they show voters it will improve roads and bridges, [DeFazio] said in a lightly edited interview with MarketWatch about his ideas.
First question: How do you propose to pay for instructure investment?
DeFazio points to the "three bipartisan infrastructure proposals" listed on his "Investing in America" webpage, the first one being "A Penny For Progress (H.R. 1664)."
Rather than increasing the 18.4 cent federal gas tax and 24.4 cent diesel tax, unchanged since 1993 when it was increased by 4.3 cents per gallon, the bill takes an extremely modest approach by indexing the gas and diesel tax to highway construction costs and reduced fuel usage due to Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, i.e., fuel efficiency standards. It hasn't moved since being introduced in March 2017, but it wasn't his first attempt at it either.
DeFazio introduced an earlier version of the bill in March 2013 where it also languished under the Obama administration that was not receptive to increasing the gas tax.
Second question: "To be clear, you believe the president would still be on board with some form of a gasoline tax?"
DeFazio expressed optimism that an agreement could be reached with the Trump administration.
The president, in my one meeting with him, advocated a substantial gas-tax increase, so I think this is still something we can work on, and we’re going to need the president, because there’s a reluctance on the part of some in the Senate.
However, it was DeFazio's analysis of how gas taxes fared in the midterms that was the most illuminating part of the interview.
In California, [incoming House] Minority Leader [Kevin] McCarthy used personal campaign funds to put on a ballot measure [Proposition 6] to repeal their gas tax and fee increase, and he got his head handed to him, in more ways than one, and it pretty well p’d off a lot of groups that are traditionally supporting Republicans — [the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC)] and others.
And then Tim Walz, my colleague, ran for governor of Minnesota and advocated a 10-cent gas increase. Next door, Michigan, a woman [Gov.-elect Gretchen Whitmer] — both red to blue states — advocated, she said, “Fix the damn roads.” [See: Minnesota Gubernatorial Candidate Campaigned on Increasing the Gas Tax and Wins].
Read the full story: Incoming House transportation chief sees no ‘political peril’ to hiking gasoline taxes to pay for infrastructure
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
California city breaks ground on transit connector
The project includes three mobility hubs and a pedestrian bridge.
After public outcry, Massachusetts city releases housing development tracker
Cambridge’s tracker currently shows 250 housing projects in various stages of development.
40 years after approval, Chicago breaks ground on new park
The park honors Jean Baptiste Point du Sable, the city’s first permanent non-native settler.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority