Planetizen - Urban Planning News, Jobs, and Education

Federal Gas Tax Legislation Would Also Tax Bikes, EVs, and Transit

Rep. Bill Shuster, who chairs the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, wants to hike gas and diesel taxes by 15 and 20 cents per gallon, respectively, add two new user fees on bicycles and electric vehicles, and test VMT fees.
July 27, 2018, 11am PDT | Irvin Dawid
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments
Daniel Korzeniewski

Will the Shuster Infrastructure Proposal, released on July 23, fare better than the Trump infrastructure plan?

According to one report on the bill, the proposal "is very unlikely to become law but will add to the discussion regarding potential infrastructure legislation in 2019."

While the Trump plan centered on picking individual projects and expecting local, state, and private funds to pay for most of the cost, the proposal by the retiring Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) focuses on making the Federal Highway Trust Fund (HTF), projected to become insolvent in two years, a sustainable source of surface transportation infrastructure funding in the near term by hiking existing taxes, adding new ones, and eliminating tax breaks. 

In the long term, it seeks to transform the HTF from a gas and diesel-tax sustained fund into one based on new user fees, presumably a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) fee, a.k.a. mileage-based user fee or road usage charge, the term used by the Oregon Department of Transportation for the nation's only operating program where motorists pay for each mile driven and are credited for state fuel taxes paid at the pump.

Ensuring near-term solvency

Highway Trust Fund Reform

"This proposal also recognizes that a number of surface transportation system users do not currently pay into the system, even though they benefit from it," states Shuster in the proposal's vision statement [pdf].

The proposal lays out a simple principle: if you are using the system in some manner, then you should help pay for it. Capturing all users of the system is a fair requirement which will benefit everyone. 

New user fees and repeal of tax breaks outlined in the discussion draft [pdf]:

  • Electric Vehicle Battery Excise Tax: Establishes a 10 percent user fee on the wholesale price of electric batteries used to propel motor vehicles. 
  • Bicycle Tire Tax: Establishes a 10 percent user fee on the wholesale price of bicycle tires used on adult bicycles. 
  • Eliminates a tax break on fuel purchased by transit agencies, but retains it for school buses.
  • Reinstates the 4.3 cents per gallon user fee on diesel used by passenger trains.

Transition away from gas and diesel taxes

The proposal "establishes a national, volunteer-based pilot program to demonstrate whether a per-mile user fee can replace the existing user fees on gasoline and diesel, which are the primary sources of revenue for the HTF...The pilot program would be administered by the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury."

On Sept. 30, 2028, gas and diesel taxes would be eliminated, perhaps the most stunning part of the Shuster proposal. But would the road usage charge be ready to replace it? That would be determined by the new "Highway Trust Fund Commission of [15] experts established to study how best to achieve the long-term solvency of the HTF." The Commission would make a recommendation to Congress, but it "cannot propose to continue or adjust the gas and diesel taxes. An innovative solution must be proposed," according to the vision statement.

The Highway Transportation would "conduct a study on the nation’s highway system and submit a report on its findings by Jan. 15, 2021,"  reports Brett Samuels for The Hill. "Shuster, who is retiring when his current term ends, had previously indicated he would introduce a bill this summer."

"Notably, unlike the Trump Administration proposal, the draft does not include provisions that would allow for tolling, according to NATSO, formerly the National Association of Truck Stop Operators, a founding member of the Alliance for Toll-Free Interstates.

"Although many stakeholders -- including NATSO -- object to certain provisions in the draft legislation, it nonetheless represents an important continuation of -- and positive shift in -- the discussion President Trump started when he released his own infrastructure proposal earlier this year," writes David Fialkov in a comprehensive analysis of Shuster's proposal.

For more details, read the complete draft of the bill [pdf].

Hat tip to IBTTA SmartBrief.

Full Story:
Published on Monday, July 23, 2018 in U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email