Ten years after former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg's congestion pricing plan died on the state Assembly floor, expect to see a similar plan revived by Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.). New York Times metro reporter, Winnie Hu, explains why it never died.
"For decades, urban planners, economists, city officials and business leaders have revived again and again some version of a toll system both to manage the city’s worsening traffic and provide more revenue for public transit, writes Winnie Hu, a reporter on The New York Times Metro desk, focusing on transportation and infrastructure.
Now a state task force, called Fix NYC, has been assembled with the goal of developing another congestion pricing plan.[...]. Mr. Cuomo, after once expressing doubt about congestion pricing’s chances, is expected to unveil a plan early next year and make it a centerpiece of his legislative agenda.
Hu chronicles the movement to keep congestion pricing (also known as cordon pricing because tolls would apply toward a specific area, below 60th Street in Manhattan, much like London, Stockholm and the world's first scheme in Singapore) alive after former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's bill died in Albany after state legislative leaders refused to bring it to a vote (also posted here).
Congestion pricing “never really went away” said Mitchell L. Moss, the director of the Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management at New York University, noting that “it has an intrinsic appeal — a single solution that raises revenue, improves our environment and reduces congestion.”
Central to the effort were three congestion pricing advocates: Sam Schwartz, Charles Komanoff and Alex Matthiessen, brought together by transit advocate, Theodore W. Kheel, a prominent lawyer and labor arbitrator, to work on the issue. Kheel passed away two years after Bloomberg's bill died.
The three continued to promote Bloomberg's plan under the group, Move NY, but made some significant changes, like lowering tolls on some bridges while adding tolls to the untolled East River bridges, a key part of the plan. Funding was provided by The Rockefeller Foundation and the Nurture Nature Foundation, which was founded by Mr. Kheel.
Timing is right in 2017
This year, the state of decay of the New York subway became really evident. In June, Gov. Cuomo declared a "state of emergency" for the subway. [See Nov. 18 update by Brian M. Rosenthal, Emma G. Fitzsimmons and Michael Laforgia in the Times]. It was painfully clear that the subway needed modernization funds.
Also this year, Cuomo, a "car guy", took notice of improvements in bridge tolling technology. Having recently celebrated the opening of the long-stalled replacement of the Tappan Zee bridge, he recognized the benefits of electronic toll technology which enable toll collection via E-ZPass transponders and vehicle license-plate recognition, eliminating the congestion caused by the presence of toll booths. Cuomo was on-board.
Challenges ahead
Before the congestion plan gets to be debated in Albany, presumably it has to pass the New York City Council, as its predecessor did on March 31, 2008, and be signed by Mayor Bill de Blasio, an opponent, who doesn't believe it is fair. Rather than charging drivers to enter Manhattan, he wants to pursue "a tax on wealthy New Yorkers to pay for improvements needed to address the crisis engulfing New York City’s subway," reported Emma G. Fitzsimmons on Aug. 6 for the Times.
"Asked what aspects of congestion pricing the mayor does not believe in, a spokesman for Mr. de Blasio returned to the idea of a new tax to fund transportation," reported David Goodman on Aug. 21 for the Times.
“It’s not a secret that the wealthiest among us aren’t paying their fair share,” said the spokesman, Austin Finan, in a statement. “If the governor disagrees, he should submit his own plan and we’ll evaluate it on the merits, including fairness and equity.”
Look for that plan next month.
FULL STORY: New York’s Tilt Toward Congestion Pricing Was Years in the Making
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
Mamdani overhauls NYC's Vision Zero plan with 100 new policy goals
The overhaul aims to reduce traffic deaths and make streets safer for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers through lower speed limits, new safety infrastructure and more.
Amtrak not solely to blame for New Jersey commuter rail's unreliability, report finds
A new study from the Garden State Initiative found that NJ Transit’s budget grew 20% across a 4 year period, but reliability declined significantly over the same period.
EPA erases limits on planet-warming pollution from power plants
Under Monday’s plan, power plants would still have some limits on how much mercury, arsenic and other contaminants they can emit.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association