Campaign 2014 Results: Bay Area Transportation, Land Use, and Soda Tax Measures
"The Bay Area’s two transportation tax measures were on track to capture the two-thirds majority needed for approval," writes Michael Cabanatuan, transportation reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle.
San Francisco voters were supporting [71.27 percent to 28.73 percent] Proposition A, a $500 million bond measure to be used for redesigned streets, more bike and transit-only lanes, updated traffic signals, improved maintenance facilities, and new elevators and escalators at Metro stations.
By comparison, we reported today that the state of Rhode Island passed a $35 million bond to fund transportation improvements. In that post, we also noted that San Francisco's "car-first" Measure L was resoundingly defeated.
In Alameda County, "the $7.8 billion Measure BB was closer but appeared headed toward the needed two-thirds approval," writes Cabanatuan. "The 30-year tax measure, nearly identical to one that narrowly failed in 2012, would extend an existing half-cent sales tax and tack on another half cent."
Turning to land use, the two "anti-growth measures adopting pro-growth language to survive" didn't survive in the ballot box—they were trounced on both sides of the Bay.
Berkeleyside reports that Measure R was rejected by 74 percent of voters, and incidentally, Measure D (soda tax) won with 75 percent of the vote—the nation's first such tax to pass. San Francisco's soda tax (Proposition E) received 57 percent, not meeting the two-thirds threshold to pass, reports Huffington Post.
On the peninsula, "Menlo Park voters (gave) Measure M a drubbing," writes Rhea Mahbubani of the San Jose Mercury News on the divisive "initiative that would have tightly restricted downtown office development."
With all 25 precincts reporting, unofficial election results show that 62.3 percent of voters rejected Measure M. (It) was championed by Save Menlo, a grassroots group of residents who fear developers will exploit loopholes in the El Camino Real/Downtown Specific Plan to build huge, traffic generating office towers and ruin the city's "village character." The group collected more than 2,400 petition signatures to qualify the initiative for the Nov. 4 ballot.
But I’ll tell you what has been astounding to me. It is that, the “community character” argument is the most powerful sword being thrown up by communities who really don’t want brown people, who really don’t want poor people, who really don’t want to see a development come into their neighborhood because they’ve got theirs, and they don’t care if someone else can’t get the same thing.