Learn today, plan for tomorrow.
Sign up for news and offers from Planetizen Courses, the online learning platform for planners.
New York Times architecture critic Michael Kimmelman surveys the changing politics of bike planning in New York City, as evidenced by a slew of innovations implemented as public health and economic stimulus actions during the pandemic. Kimmelman starts off by describing recent planning developments, all documented previously Planetizen, as a glimmer of hope for a change to planning in the city.
According to Kimmelman, the city is faced with two particularly ambitious potential paths forward to ensure a more bike-friendly future: the Regional Plan Association's Five Borough Bikeway Plan and the Queens Ribbon Bridge. The time is now to act on plans like these, argues Kimmelman:
Getting through this whole crisis depends on city leaders’ capacity to think ahead, not hunker down. Robert Moses, New York’s storied planning czar, plotted during the depths of the Depression so he could be ready when the money materialized. Whatever else one might say about Moses, he knew how to get stuff done.
By contrast, New York today has become good at shooting down new ideas, celebrating defeat over compromise, pointing out why any big, costly initiative is not worth pursuing because something else also needs doing, as if a great city shouldn’t find ways to do more than one thing at a time.
The city has changed before, according to one of the big statements included in this article. The current economic and public health crisis could provide another tipping point.