No issue is more important to California's air and climate regulators than ensuring that the state retains its ability to set tailpipe emission standards. Mary Nichols, the head of the Air Resources Board, has threatened to ban tailpipes.
"Even if most people outside California have never heard of Mary Nichols, she’s the world’s most influential automotive regulator, says Levi Tillemann, author of The Great Race, a book on the future of automobile technology," wrote John Lippert for Bloomberg News (posted here) in August 2015.
Nichols continues her leadership of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for at least the first phase of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration, no doubt to the chagrin of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew R. Wheeler and U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao, who head the two departments that determine greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy standards for light-duty vehicles.
The Trump administration's Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles (SAFE) Rule, proposed last August, would freeze vehicle emissions standards at 2020 levels. In addition, the administration may withdraw the EPA waiver that allows California and like-minded states to set stricter standards than the federal government.
Nichols' threat to ban sales of light-duty vehicles powered by internal combustion engines by a future date was not made to the Trump administration nor the auto industry but during a joint workshop of the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and California Air Resources Board held May 16 in San Diego. Jennifer A Dlouhy reports for Bloomberg News:
“If we lose the state vehicle standards, we have to fill up the gap with other measures,” Nichols said at a forum on the issue Thursday.
“We will be faced with dramatic alternatives in terms of tighter, stricter controls on everything else, including movement of vehicles and potentially looking at things like fees and taxes and bans on certain types of vehicles and products.”
Dloughy notes that Nichols' prepared remarks were even more explicit:
“CARB will be exploring ways to ensure communities get the reductions of air pollution they so desperately need to keep the air clean and breathable -- and continue to fight climate change...
"That might mean, for example, tougher requirements for low-carbon fuels, looking at tighter health-protective regulations on California refineries, doubling down on our enforcement efforts on mobile and stationary sources -- and might lead to an outright ban on internal combustion engines.”
State legislation
Two bills to ban the sale of internal combustion engine vehicles by 2040 were introduced this year and last, both by Assemblymember Phil Ting (D-San Francisco). However, neither AB 40 nor AB 1745, respectively, were ever heard in committee.
Alternative to ban: market-based feebate
Environment reporter Rachel Becker wrote about the joint CTC/CARB workshop for CALmatters, a nonpartisan, nonprofit journalism venture, on May 24 (source article).
A ban on gas-powered cars isn’t imminent, Nichols said in an interview with CALmatters this week. “Ban — it’s not a word that we use, and we don’t like to use it,” she said. “But sometimes, we perhaps have to make a point. And the message here was intended to be heard by the auto industry.”
Becker describes the likely legal battle that would ensue should such a ban be enacted, but she also explores whether it would be a good idea.
“That would be a very blunt, last resort approach,” Daniel Sperling, director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at UC Davis and a member of the air board, said in an email.
Sperling said he thinks a better strategy would be a legislative one called “feebates,” which use fees to discourage dirty car use, and rebates to encourage people to drive cleaner vehicles. The Legislature has yet to agree.
Feebates tackle both parts of California's motor vehicle sales problem from an emissions perspective. Increased rebates would help spur more sales of zero-emission vehicles, and a fee on high-emitters would encourage consumers to consider alternatives to sport utility vehicles, the largest and still-growing segment of the state's auto market, as sales of more fuel-efficient cars recede.
At this point, feebates, last proposed in the legislature over a decade ago, and/or bans, are speculative. The only certainty is that CARB and EPA will be fighting each other over emissions standards in court.
-
White House Ends Talks with California Over Fuel Efficiency Standards, February 25, 2019
Hat tip to Weekly CALmatters.
Read the full story: Why California’s air board won’t ban gas-powered cars yet
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority