The auto industry appears to be balking at supporting the Trump administration's plan to freeze vehicle emission standards at 2020 levels even though they initially asked Trump to loosen the rigorous Obama-era fuel efficiency rule that goes to 2026.
Last August, Transportation Secretary Elaine L. Chao and acting EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler introduced the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026. Freezing the standards at 2020 levels would amount to "the most environmentally significant regulatory rollback yet," according to a comprehensive analysis by the Rhodium Group.
"White House officials have launched an intense lobbying campaign as they seek to line up support for [the] proposal they hope to finalize this summer," report Juliet Eilperin Brady Dennis for The Washington Post. Chief among their targets is the automotive industry, which would appear to already be on their side based on their earlier position.
Auto companies asked Trump to reassess federal fuel efficiency standards within days of him taking office, a point administration officials raised during a Feb. 21 conference call and a meeting at the White House on Friday with representatives from Fiat Chrysler, Ford and General Motors.
“We’re doing it for you, we’re deregulating the sector for you,” is the way one senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations, put it. “We hope you get behind us.”
While the Post reporters did find that some auto representatives reacted positively to freezing the standards, e.g., "a Fiat spokesman said the company supports mileage targets 'based on market realities,' noting that gas prices are low and bigger vehicles remain popular with consumers," the industry group is reacting cautiously.
The Auto Alliance, whose members produce more than 70 percent of cars and light-duty trucks in the United States, has continued to voice concerns about the administration’s approach. Auto Alliance spokeswoman Gloria Bergquist said in an interview Thursday [March 7] that the group supports “year-over-year increases in fuel economy” and a nationwide standard that includes California and its affiliated states. Any regulation that fails to achieve that, she said, would lead to litigation and force firms to sell a different mix of vehicles in parts of the country.
Bergquist is referring to what are known as Section 177 (of the Clean Air Plan) or CARB (for California Air Resources Board) states: the 13 states and District of Columbia that have adopted California's Low-Emission Vehicle (LEV) standards and/or Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV) program requirement, listed here by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, accounting for as much as 40 percent of all new light-duty vehicles sold in the United States
Calling for annual increases beyond 2020 is clearly not freezing the standards, which may account for the bolder headline in E&E News on Friday: "The rollback that automakers don't want." According to Maxine Joselow, "not one automaker has issued a statement of support" for the SAFE Rule.
One industry group not balking from supporting the SAFE Rule is the oil industry, particularly refineries, as posted earlier.
"Under the Trump administration's proposal, Americans will use 20 percent more gasoline per year by 2035, according to an analysis by Energy Innovation, a San Francisco-based energy and environmental policy firm," adds Joselow.
How did this happen?
In a March 6 opinion for Business Insider, Matthew DeBord explains how the auto industry's initial request to the Trump administration to weaken the Obama rule calling for 54.5 mpg by 2025 backfired, leading "to the present chaos, as California took a defiant stance toward a revocation of its waiver and the car companies realized that the administration was pushing beyond the earlier bargain."
Related in Planetizen:
White House Ends Talks with California Over Fuel Efficiency Standards, February 25, 2019
Who's Advocating Rolling Back Fuel Economy Standards? December 17, 2018
Amtrak Ramping Up Infrastructure Projects
Thanks to federal funding from the 2021 infrastructure act, the agency plans to triple its investment in infrastructure improvements and new routes in the next two years.
The Unceremonious Death of a Freeway Expansion Project
The end of an Oregon freeway project didn't get much fanfare, but the victory is worth celebrating.
Ending Downtown San Francisco’s ‘Doom Loop’
A new public space project offers an ambitious vision—so why is the city implementing it at such a small scale?
Kaua’i County Uses Long-Range Models to Mandate Resiliency Standards
The county requires builders to assess potential flood risks using models that account for sea level rise projected as far out as 2100.
California Governor Vetoes Autonomous Truck Ban
Gov. Newsom called the new law unnecessary, citing existing efforts by state regulators to develop new rules around autonomous trucking.
Low-Barrier Motel Shelter Is a Success—But Not an Easy One
Many guests at Motels4Now are on their second or third stays—but staff say that's doesn't equal failure, and the numbers bear that out.
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact: Mobility, Community, Possibility
Lassen County Planning and Building Services
City of San Carlos
National Capital Planning Commission
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.