Will Boston Follow New York City and Consider Cordon Tolling?
On Feb. 26, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio announced that they agreed that congestion pricing should move forward in Manhattan's Central Business District, with the goal of passing state legislation in April.
"To be sure, there is no proposal at any government level as of late February to enact congestion pricing in Boston or the Boston area," writes Tom Acitelli, who, as editor of Curbed Boston, has been following congestion pricing since at least 2012. The controversial pricing strategy of charging motorists for driving into the downtown area has come up more often in the last year, with two prominent reports recently released showing the benefits of pursuing a plan like New York's MTA Transformation Plan:
On Feb. 21, a group of Massachusetts business leaders called A Better City, in consultation with the University of Massachusetts’ Donahue Institute released a "Transportation Finance Update" report identifying a projected $8.4 billion gap in Massachusetts transportation funding requirements between 2019 and 2028.
Among its recommendations, according to Acitelli:
- "[A]n increase in the frequency of tolls for drivers going in and out of the state and for those traveling around the Boston region on I-93 or I-95 (currently, they only get you with the tolls if you’re coming and going on I-90)."
- "[C]alls for congestion pricing in the Boston area via the all-electronic tolling (AET) already at the state’s disposal...For example, by implementing a system similar to London’s, a 5am–7pm weekday congestion charge of $5.00 imposed on major roadways crossing I-95/MA 128 could raise $2.9 billion over 10 years."
Additional user fees the report recommends, according to Bruce Mohl, the editor of CommonWealth magazine, "include raising the gas tax or applying the state sales tax to gasoline purchases; putting a price on the carbon contained in vehicle fuels; ... hiking the fees on ride-hailing apps to match T fares; and launching a vehicle miles traveled fee."
On Jan. 29, the Boston Green Ribbon Commission released its "Carbon Free Boston" report, laying out steps to help the entire city achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.
"Congestion pricing—charging motorists for driving into busier parts of the city at certain times—has long been controversial, but that might be one of the more easily implemented transportation changes necessary to making Boston carbon neutral," wrote Acitelli.
Maybe easy to implement, but it's the political challenge that has proven to be the most difficult hurdle. Last February, Acitelli reported on poll results that found that "38 percent of respondents want to see officials charge motorists for driving into the region’s busier areas during busier periods (a.k.a. rush hour). Some 55 percent oppose the idea."
That's actually quite a bit better than a January poll on attitudes towards a possible San Francisco cordon tolling plan taken by the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, which opposes the plan, that found that "30 percent of San Franciscans backing the idea, and 65 percent rejecting it." And the Seattle Time Traffic Lab found only 26 percent supported a proposal there. Like the Carbon Free Boston proposal, it is included in Mayor Jenny Durkan's Seattle Climate Action plan.
Of the two recent reports promoting congestion pricing, this correspondent sees the Transportation Finance Update being more politically powerful as it draws parallels to the New York plan that is now advancing in that it is directly tied to desperately needed investment in public transit.
Related in Planetizen:
'Carbon Free Boston' Puts Priority on Land Use and Transportation Planning, January 31, 2019
- Boston Dedicated Bus Lanes Facing Funding Questions, January 11, 2019
After East Boston Toll Booths Were Automated..., December 16, 2018
The Millennials Who Came to Save Public Transit in Boston, October 29, 2018
Could Boston Join Seattle in Proposing Congestion Pricing? April 19, 2018
Hat tip to IBTTA SmartBrief.