Planetizen - Urban Planning News, Jobs, and Education

Manhattan Congestion Pricing Effort Ends With For-Hire Vehicle Fee

A new fee on trips made in ride-hailing and other for-hire vehicles and taxis in much of Manhattan was approved by the New York State legislature as part of the budget legislation. Plans for future tolls on cars and trucks weren't included.
April 16, 2018, 5am PDT | Irvin Dawid
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments
New York City

"As part of a $168.3 billion [New York State] budget approved overnight Friday [March 30], lawmakers inserted a new fee of $2.75 per trip on for-hire vehicles [FHV] — which in New York City includes ride-hail services like Uber and Lyft as well as traditional black cars and liveries — if the trip starts or ends in Manhattan south of 96th Street," report Dana Rubinstein and Jimmy Vielkind for POLITICO New York on April 2.

Taxi trips, which are already subject to a 50-cent surcharge throughout the city, would now be subject to a $2.50 fee in the same area. Car pool services like Via [and uberPOOL] would be charged 75 cents per trip.

"It was the easiest of all of the possible steps they could have taken, and we know it really won’t solve the problem," said Nick Sifuentes, executive director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, a non-profit, transportation policy advocacy organization.

Sifuentes is referring to the three revenue measures included in the January 2018 Fix NYC Advisory Panel Report [pdf] released in late January. In addition to the fees on taxis and FHVs, the panel recommended "a zone pricing program, first for trucks, and then for all vehicles, entering Manhattan’s CBD below 60th Street."

The real question facing both supporters and opponents of Manhattan cordon area congestion pricing is whether the new fees are the beginning or the end of the Fix NYC report's recommendations.

"In a sign of things to come, the congestion zone was not in budget amendments submitted by the governor, or in budget proposals by the Republican-led Senate and the Democrat-dominated Assembly," reported Winnie Hu for The New York Times on March 31.

The budget agreement drew criticism from a coalition of transportation advocacy groups which expressed disappointment that months of pushing for congestion pricing had yielded so little.

“Fixing our transit system should have been Albany’s first priority this year,” they said in a joint statement. “Unfortunately, the final budget does not offer a credible plan to modernize the M.T.A., nor provide a sufficient revenue stream to make it possible. The crisis in our subways and on our streets will continue, and New Yorkers will continue to demand action from Governor Cuomo and state lawmakers.”

While not nearly as much as a cordon toll applicable to all vehicles, the aforementioned fees "generate some $400 million a year for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority [MTA]," according to the governor’s office estimates, report Rubinstein and Vielkind. 

Scott Rechler, a developer and Cuomo appointee to the MTA board who sat on the Fix NYC Panel, said, “The [for-hire vehicle] thing is important because it provides another source of revenue and provides the foundation for congestion pricing, which, if we keep applying the pressure, is something that can happen in the next 12 to 18 months.”

The Democratic-controlled Assembly did not support the full Fix NYC cordon pricing plan, with many outer-borough representatives whose constituents lack direct access to subways opposed. Democrats proposed a $1 statewide ride-hailing fee in addition to the congestion zone fee, with all revenue dedicated to transit around the state, reported Rubinstein and Vielkind on March 23.

“We’re looking for a surcharge on those for-hire vehicles that are in the zone and dedicate that funding to the subway funding, long-term, and use it as step one in an overall congestion pricing plan,” Cuomo said during a Friday afternoon call to NY1.

Transportation network companies expressed support for the Fix NYC plan, but not the stand-alone FHV fee, and also opposed the $1 "outer borough fee" in the Democrat's plan.

With Republicans who control the state Senate saying they’re opposed to any new taxes, it's surprising to this California-based correspondent that proponents were able to retain the zone fee for FHVs.

Cuomo takes criticism

"Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat who faces re-election in November, came under increasing criticism from advocates who said he did not do enough to move congestion pricing forward," wrote Hu of the Times. "They pointed out that he did not aggressively line up legislative support as he had with other divisive issues such as same-sex marriage and the minimum wage — a suggestion the governor’s aides rejected."

Advocates to persist

The Fix NYC Coalition, composed of 16 groups from business, labor, environment, transportation and planning sectors, issued the following statement on April 2:

“Albany must now finish the job by enacting the remainder of the Fix NYC plan, including establishing a congestion zone around the Central Business District...The Fix NYC Transit coalition is committed to seeing this process through to the end and won’t rest until the full Fix NYC recommendations are adopted and implemented.”

More reading: "NYC politicians, transit advocates react to Cuomo’s 2019 state budget," Metro NY, April 2.

Related posts in Planetizen:

Hat tip to Eno Transportation Weekly.

Full Story:
Published on Monday, April 2, 2018 in Politico New York
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email