Caling the upcoming vote on AB 398, which has created strange political bedfellows, "the most important vote of your life," Gov. Jerry Brown cast the decision as choosing between "massive new regulations" and market-based mechanisms.
At stake is the ability to continue the state's most important mechanism to reduce emissions and fund mitigation. While cap-and-trade withstood a final court challenge last month when the state Supreme Court rejected an appeal by business groups, it's ability to continue operation after 2020 is questionable as the bill that authorized it, AB 32, called for reductions to the year 2020. To ensure the successor program is not challenged as an illegal tax, Gov. Brown wants the bill to pass by a two-thirds supermajority vote.
The legislative package pushed by Gov. Brown, Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) and Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon (D-Paramount) includes AB 617 (Toxic Air Pollution Standards: to increase monitoring and impose stricter penalties on polluters), by Assemblymembers Cristina Garcia (D-Bell Gardens), Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella), and Miguel Santiago (D-Los Angeles), and AB 398 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: market-based compliance mechanisms), by Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella), to continue the current cap-and-trade program beyond 2020.
Planetizen's last post on the continuation of this vital program indicated that the bill backed by leadership was SB 775, initially posted here, that returned much of the revenue raised by cap-and-trade to residents in the form of 'climate dividends.'
"[AB 398] faces opposition from both the right and left, with Republicans questioning its economic impact while environmental justice advocates call it too kind to the oil industry," reports David Baker for the San Francisco Chronicle. However, the politics has created strange bedfellows.
Supporters include such environmental groups as the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Environmental Defense Fund, as well as the California Chamber of Commerce — the organization that sued to upend cap and trade.
Opponents, meanwhile, include the Sierra Club [California] — which believes the bill is too generous to oil companies — and, so far, the Senate Republican caucus.
"The oil lobby has had way too much influence on this legislation," Bill Magavern, policy director of the Coalition for Clean Air, said outside the Capitol on July 10, reports Associated Press writer Kathleen Ronayne.
Market-based mechanism vs. 'command and control'
Cap and trade works by setting an annual limit on the state’s greenhouse gas emissions and forcing companies to buy a permit, called an allowance, for every metric ton of heat-trapping gases they emit. The number of allowances available each year equals the cap, and both decrease over time, reducing emissions.
If companies have a hard time quickly cutting emissions, they can buy allowances from the state, or from each other
Brown warns that without cap-and-trade "the state would switch to using direct 'command and control' regulations—an approach that could mean ordering specific cuts from specific industries on a set timetable," writes Baker. "Cap and trade, by contrast, gives businesses flexibility in how and when they cut emissions and is generally considered to cost less."
If Brown is unable to continue the cap-and-trade program, it may make it more difficult to promote his climate change efforts that he and several other governors initiated in the aftermath of President Trump's June 1 announcement to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.
Read the full story: Brown threatens ‘intrusive’ climate rules if cap and trade fails
California Legislature Approves Continuation of Cap-and-Trade Program
The nation's only state-run, market-based program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will continue until 2031 without fear of litigation, as it passed with the required two-thirds supermajority needed for tax increases, along with two related bills.
California's Business-Friendly, Bipartisan Approach to Climate Change
Gov. Jerry Brown, accompanied by former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, signed legislation to continue the cap-and-trade program initially authorized under a bill signed by his Republican predecessor 11 years ago at the same Treasure Island location.
California Cap-and-Trade Overhaul and Extension Emphasizes Dividend and Equity
While California cap-and-trade survived a legal challenge last month, a haze still surrounds the program. Carbon permit sales are low, and the program's longevity is threatened after 2020. A new bill was introduced to transform the program.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Move over, LA: St. Louis gears up for Olympics, invests millions in downtown redevelopment
The Missouri city will host the 2028 Olympic soccer group stage and knockout matches.
Maryland’s $15 billion bridge project gains key approval
The Maryland Transit Authority said the project will create over 60,000 jobs and add $23 billion to the local economy.
‘No clear next steps’ for Chicago's permanent festival grounds
Eleventh Ward Ald. Nicole Lee has suggested Soldier Field as a possible location for the permanent event space.
California, Hawaii, Rhode Island approve housing propositions
Hawaii and Rhode Island each approved their sole proposition, while California approved two of its three.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority