A California state senator has proposed to overhaul California’s cap-and-trade system explains the changes he wants to see.
California successfully defended its cap-and-trade program from a recent legal challenge, but it still has to wrestle with what will happen when the program expires in 2020—especially since the state emissions reduction target extends to 2030.
One proposal, from Senator Bob Wieckowski, is to essentially replace the current system with a new version of cap and trade that would change both how carbon is priced and how the revenues are spent. In The Planning Report, Wieckowski describes the three broad categories of investment his plan would create: climate research, infrastructure adaptation, and a new consumer program called "climate dividends."
"When we set a cap, there is necessarily going to be an increase in the price of gasoline and carbon-based products," he explains. "The idea is to return some of the money generated to the consumer, to ease the increased direct costs that we anticipate."
He also wants to see the state's investment in infrastructure shift to prioritize the upgrade or even relocation of basic facilities like sewers and roads, especially in disadvantaged communities.
Some of these facilities are located in areas that are endangered by sea-level rise and climate change. As we rebuild them, it may not be possible to simply fortify the surrounding ground. They may actually have to be moved to, for lack of a better term, higher ground. That’s quite a change from how we’re using cap-and-trade funds right now.
New technologies and innovations, meanwhile, would be explored through a third bucket of money dedicated to researching best climate adaptation practices. That approach speaks to Wieckowski's broader vision of where California fits into the global effort toward resilience.
"California's forte is the export of problem-solving ideas and devices that can help out the rest of the world," he says. Especially in light of the Trump administration's "disinterest" in climate action, he says, "People are looking for answers from us. How California goes, the world wants to go."
Read the full story: State Senator Wieckowski Offers Alternative to Post-2020 Cap and Trade
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority