More than Twenty Bills Introduced in Texas Legislature to Stop High-Speed Rail
Ten Texas legislators filed more than 20 bills last week to stop Texas Central's high-speed rail project that will take only 90 minutes to go from Dallas to Houston, traveling at speeds up to 205 miles per hour. Brandon Formby, urban affairs reporter for The Texas Tribune, reports on the main issue behind the flurry of bills: whether Texas Central has the legal ability to expropriate private property for public use, with payment to property owners.
[P]roject opponents cite [a] provision of the transportation code that defines a railroad with such power as a company “operating” a line. Since Texas Central’s bullet train isn’t yet up and running, they argue the company and its subsidiaries can’t possibly be considered a railroad since the word “operating” is written in present tense.
Texas Central Partners, LLC (Texas Central), the private company building the project, shrugs off the charges that it is not a railroad and therefore lacks the ability to utilize eminent domain. Furthermore, they hope that they can secure agreements by negotiating with land owners without resorting to the controversial process.
Jill Cowan, economics news reporter for Dallas News, reported that Texas Central Partners on Feb. 7 dropped "more than a dozen lawsuits against landowners who refused to allow the company on their property to survey." By doing so, it hopes "to negotiate with landowners more amicably
"Earlier this month, Texas Central announced about 30 percent of the parcels needed for the 240-mile project are covered under sale option agreements, meaning landowners have agreed to sell the land once the project has the necessary environmental clearances and is ready for construction," reports Dug Begley of the Houston Chronicle.
The nation's 'other' high-speed rail project, now under construction for two years, has also been delayed by land acquisition issues in California's Central Valley. Tim Sheehan reported in April 2015 for the Fresno Bee on 50 eminent domain lawsuits filed in Fresno County against the California High-Speed Rail Authority and on a bill proposed to curb the use of eminent domain by the rail authority.
Most high-speed rail litigation in California has involved the California Environmental Quality Act, unique to the Golden State, and issues pertaining to the Proposition 1A, the 2008, $9.95 billion general obligation bond measure that authorized the project.
While Republicans have introduced state legislation to challenge high-speed rail, their minority status and Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown's strong support for the project make their efforts difficult, but not so on a federal level.
Last month the state's GOP congressional delegation sent the Federal Transit Administration a letter asking they delay a vital decision on a $647 million grant to electrify the Caltrain commuter rail corridor between San Jose and San Francisco only because the tracks would be shared with high-speed rail. The FTA agreed, and now both projects are jeopardized.