The cost increases and delays on the Central Valley project have some state lawmakers wondering whether funds should go toward local transit systems instead.
"Thirteen years since California voters approved $10 billion to build a bullet train," writes Marissa Garcia, "Democrats who run the state government are divided over spending the money to finish building the first section of track — a 119-mile stretch in the Central Valley."
Some wonder whether the funds would be better spent expanding urban transit in more heavily populated regions. Ethan Elkind, director of the climate program at the UC Berkeley School of Law, says starting the project in the Central Valley was unusual. "Typically what you’d see with projects like this is they’d start where the people are at and then radiate outwards. So, we would have started building high-speed rail in the San Francisco Bay Area, down in LA, and then eventually connect it," Elkind told CalMatters.
"The Newsom administration, however, praises high-speed rail as a job creator in the economically-struggling Central Valley." But "[k]ey lawmakers, especially in the Assembly, say they don’t see the benefit for their Southern California constituents. And even if the bullet train eventually reaches Los Angeles and San Francisco, some legislators are skeptical that car-centric Californians will become train riders without more exposure to public transit in their daily lives."
Assembly Transportation Committee chairperson Laura Friedman questioned the value of spending additional billions on the Central Valley train. "With a quarter of California’s population living in Los Angeles County, Friedman would like to see money spent on improving Union Station in Los Angeles, the Metrolink commuter rail and transit between the San Fernando Valley and LA’s Westside." She argues that "better local service will boost support for trains, eventually restoring voters’ favor for high-speed rail."
"A poll funded by the Assembly Democrats found that Californians are evenly split between killing high-speed rail or continuing it, but that support for the project is far higher among Democrats, the San Francisco Chronicle reported."
Read the full story: Bullet train budget battle: Should California spend more on urban transit, not high-speed rail?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic Place Names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority