Candidates drop names for a reason.
Despite campaign platforms and media coverage that have focused with unprecedented intensity on matters related to the built and natural environments, last week's Democrat Candidate debates featured only one signature moment that addressed urban policies: the tit-for-tat between Senator Kamala Harris and former Vice President Joe Biden over bussing policies in Berkeley, California, which has been widely discussed in the media since the debates.
Laura Bliss writes for CityLab to document the other, less ballyhooed mentions of urban policy and specific local contexts throughout the two-day debate event.
Bliss prefaces this analysis with an interesting idea about the way candidates use references to local and regional signifiers to build credibility and recognition with the audience:
On a presidential debate stage, place matters. With a slew of candidates jockeying for breakout moments and, in many cases, introducing themselves to a national audience for the first time, regional identifiers are one of the best sorting mechanisms voters get. But presidential aspirants must balance playing up their hometown roots to tell stories and display their relatability with the need to make sweeping gestures toward national reconciliation. Many reeled off campaign stops to build credibility with unfamiliar regions. Some places appeared as political touchstones, like the locations of recent mass shootings, or synecdoches like “Washington” and “Wall Street.” Certain candidates repeatedly highlighted geography as destiny—but it may be just as telling who abandoned their atlases.
The article includes a map of the specific place references that also indicates the candidates' hometowns, as well as a map of worldwide locations referenced by the candidates. The bulk of the article is devoted to each reference by candidates of specific locations and policies that affect communities.
Under the criteria for the next round of debates, scheduled for July, only 14 of the current candidates would qualify, so the sample size of opinion on matters involving cities from the Democratic candidates for president is bound to start shrinking, and soon. The criteria get even more stringent in September.
Read the full story: We Mapped Every Place Mentioned by the Democratic Candidates
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
California city breaks ground on transit connector
The project includes three mobility hubs and a pedestrian bridge.
After public outcry, Massachusetts city releases housing development tracker
Cambridge’s tracker currently shows 250 housing projects in various stages of development.
40 years after approval, Chicago breaks ground on new park
The park honors Jean Baptiste Point du Sable, the city’s first permanent non-native settler.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority