The California High Speed Rail Project is a political pawn in a contentious back and forth between the Golden State and the Trump administration.
"The Trump administration made good Thursday on its threat to cancel nearly $1 billion in federal funds for California’s high-speed rail project, saying the state has “abandoned” its original plan for San Francisco-to-Los Angeles service in favor of a truncated line in the Central Valley," report Tal Kopan and John Wildermuth.
The Trump administration is making good on a threat to rescind the funding after California Governor Gavin Newsom spoke in his first state-of-state address about the need to reconsider the plan for the massive project. Gov. Newsom suggested focusing on the initial phase of the project between Bakersfield and Merced, the Federal Railroad Administration said that $928.6 million awarded to the project was dependent on the construction of the full, San Francisco to Los Angeles route.
"What’s more, it added, construction delays mean the state hasn’t complied with conditions for federal funding 'and has failed to make reasonable progress on the project,'" according to Kopan and Wildermuth.
California High Speed Rail Authority officials are quoted in the article saying the Trump administration decision will not kill the project. "The system has $9 billion from Proposition 1A, which voters approved in 2008; $2.55 billion in federal money that’s already been spent; and $500 million to $750 million a year in state cap-and-trade funds from air quality protection efforts," according to the article.
A separate article by Ralph Vartabedian and Stuart Leavenworth on the Trump administration's actions notes that in addition to rescinding the $929-million grant for project construction, the Federal Railroad Administration could still decide to force the state to reimburse "$2.5 billion in another grant that the state already has spent."
Read the full story: Trump administration cancels California’s high-speed rail funding
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority