The details of drastic reductions to the proposed building program for Austin’s Project Connect long-range transit plan are now open for public comment.

The Austin Transit Partnership (ATP), the government corporation empowered to finance and develop the Project Connect long-term transit plan in Austin has released a proposed revision of the plan, as promised after cost increases forced reductions to the plan.
Nathan Bernier reports for KUT on the revisions, which were leaked earlier this month, but made public on Tuesday, March 21 at a public meeting at the Austin Public Library.
ATP has spent months paring down Project Connect in preparation for the release this week. After seeing the costs for the Project Connect program balloon from an estimated $5.8 billion to $10.3 billion, the plan would now spend less than $5 billion, “including a whopping 40% cost contingency,” reports Bernier.
The ATP hopes a $3.5 billion cushion “will make its pitch more appealing to the federal government,” which is expected to fund up top half of the cost included in the Project Connect program.
The source article, linked below, includes details for each of the five remaining alternatives—all of which represent a significant reduction from the original plan Austin voters approved in the November 2020 election. The original plan called for two new light rail lines, four new rapid bus routes, and a new commuter rail line, as well as expanded service on the city’s existing commuter rail route, in addition to anti-displacement measures and on-demand transit shuttles.
Additional challenges could still await Project Connect if conservative members of the Texas State Legislature manage to approve a proposed bill that would limit ATP’s powers to finance projects. “The Austin Transit Partnership will collect public feedback over the next six weeks,” according to Bernier.
FULL STORY: Austin's light-rail plans have shrunk. Here are 5 new options.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and harrowing close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)