Limiting development has been a powerful tool for anti-gentrification activists, but have these policies had counter-productive effects?

In a piece for The Atlantic, Jacob Anbinder challenges the popular thesis that new housing construction in historic neighborhoods causes gentrification, calling the concept misguided and pointing to declining rents during 2020 as proof.
Since the mid-20th century, housing activists and politicians have painted development as broadly detrimental to affordable housing, arguing that this "gentrification-industrial complex" is a key driver of displacement and rising housing costs. This "growth revolt" brought together stakeholders from across the political spectrum, pitting wealthy homeowners and low-income renters against developers. For once, "nature enthusiasts, architectural historians, homeowners, and rock-ribbed socialists" could all agree on something.
"This anti-growth partnership presumes that the interests of the landed and the landless are aligned—that a policy of more tightly regulated development can both generate wealth for those who own property and redistribute it to those who don’t."
The 1970s and 1980s saw the growth of design review boards, height limits, and other density restrictions that continue to shape urban development today. Anbinder argues that these cosmetic changes, which treat luxury construction as a cause rather than consequence of neighborhood change and gentrification, don't acknowledge the true causes of rising housing costs. In his assessment, slow growth policies may have in fact exacerbated the current housing crisis by limiting the number of available units. The difference, he writes, is in ownership. "The telltale sign of a neighborhood in transition isn’t a yoga studio or a high-rise apartment building. It is an old rowhouse, meticulously renovated."
FULL STORY: The Pandemic Disproved Urban Progressives’ Theory About Gentrification

Rethinking Redlining
For decades we have blamed 100-year-old maps for the patterns of spatial racial inequity that persist in American cities today. An esteemed researcher says: we’ve got it all wrong.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

California High-Speed Rail's Plan to Right Itself
The railroad's new CEO thinks he can get the project back on track. The stars will need to align this summer.

US Senate Reverses California EV Mandate
The state planned to phase out the sale of gas-powered cars by 2035, a goal some carmakers deemed impossible to meet.

Trump Cuts Decimate Mapping Agency
The National Geodetic Survey maintains and updates critical spatial reference systems used extensively in both the public and private sectors.

Washington Passes First US ‘Shared Streets’ Law
Cities will be allowed to lower speed limits to 10 miles per hour and prioritize pedestrians on certain streets.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions