Election Post-Mortem: Politics Trumps Public Health

An analysis by the Associated Press found that voters in counties that are disproportionately impacted by the coronavirus were far more likely to support President Trump's reelection than voters in less-impacted counties.

November 9, 2020, 11:00 AM PST

By Irvin Dawid


COVID-19 protests

Aaron of L.A. Photography / Shutterstock

"Out of 376 counties with the highest number of new coronavirus infections per capita, a whopping 93% went for Trump, according to an analysis by the Associated Press," writes science correspondent, Amina Khan, for the Los Angeles Times newsletter, Coronavirus Today, on Nov. 6.

Most of these were rural counties in Montana, the Dakotas, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa and Wisconsin. These also happen to be the kinds of areas where people put less stock in protective public health measures such as social distancing and mask-wearing.

During the spring peak in New York City, New Jersey, New Orleans, and Detroit, the prevailing wisdom was to link the outbreak with population densitywhether it be the packed subways or crowded sidewalks as opposed to the "natural social distancing" associated with rural areas. The AP analysis is important because the focus on preventing COVID infections shifts to behavior—such as the willingness to wear masks, practice social distancing, and avoid indoor mass gatherings, e.g., political rallies or church services, rather than population or residential density.

The differing views on President Trump's performance were also indicative of the urban-rural divide in addition to the debates over public health vs. the economy and public health vs. individual rights/civil liberties. In any case, state health officials will need to carefully target their messages to deal with the new geography of the pandemic.

"Public health officials need to step back, listen to and understand the people who aren’t taking the same stance" on mask-wearing and other control measures, said Dr. Marcus Plescia of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials [ASTHO] in the AP article on the analysis showing the high correlation of case incidence with support for President Trump.

The association has launched a #MaskUp Campaign. Looking at the track record of a similar campaign in North Dakota, it doesn't seem to have been very effective. From a related post, "Can the Public Be Educated to Wear Masks?October 5, 2020:

The Harvard Global Health Institute/Brown University School of Public Health COVID Risk Levels Dashboard  shows that the case incidence has since more than doubled in North Dakota, with 52.7 daily new cases per 100k people (7-day moving average) based on Oct. 2 data, over four times the national average of 13 cases per 100k people. 

North Dakota: highest COVID-19 case incidence in the nation and world

The North Dakota COVID-19 case incidence has more than tripled since then. It was 176 per 100k (7-day rolling average) on Nov. 8, according to The Washington Post. Next highest: South Dakota, with 134 daily new cases/100k. The U.S. average was 32 cases/100k.

On an international level, The Post indicates that the Czech Republic and Belgium had the highest case incidence, each with 102 cases/100k.

There appeared to be little evidence that the pandemic had any effect on the election results in North Dakota in the sense that the GOP swept all races.

"President Trump posted another lopsided victory Tuesday in North Dakota, getting 65% of the vote, compared to 63% four years ago," reported The Bismarck Tribune. "Republican Gov. Doug Burgum captured 66% of the vote in his bid for reelection."

A separate Bloomberg analysis correlating high COVID-fatality counties with Trump support confirms the AP analysis of case incidence.

"In those counties that ranked among the top 10% for Covid-19 deaths per person, Trump’s margin of victory improved an average of 2.8 percentage points, increasing from 23.6 points in 2016 to 26.4 points this year," wrote Andre TartarDavid IngoldJeremy C.F. Lin and Paul Murray on Nov. 4. 

Related in Planetizen:

Friday, November 6, 2020 in Los Angeles Times

Chicago Commute

Planning for Congestion Relief

The third and final installment of Planetizen's examination of the role of the planning profession in both perpetuating and solving traffic congestion.

May 12, 2022 - James Brasuell

LAX Cars

Car Noise Is Killing Us

It’s not just traffic collisions that kill—a new study from researcher at Rutgers finds that the loud noises emanating from cars has direct impact on heart health in Americans.

May 6, 2022 - Streetsblog USA

A pair of crash test dummies in a car after a crash with air bags deployed.

Acceptable Deaths

What can we learn from our Covid response?

May 5, 2022 - Angie Schmitt

Single-Family Housing Construction

New White House Housing Initiative Includes Zoning Reform Incentives

The Biden administration this morning released a new program of actions intended to spur housing construction around the United States.

2 minutes ago - The White House

Washington D.C.

Fare-Free Transit Hasn’t Reduced Car Trips, Data Says

Fare-free transit isn’t the climate change benefit that many have hoped, according to recent writing by David Zipper for Bloomberg.

1 hour ago - Bloomberg

Cottages on Western Avenue, Chicago, Illinois

Redevelopment Threatens Iconic, Affordable Chicago Homes

The ‘workers’ cottages’ are being replaced with larger, more expensive homes, threatening one of the city’s original forms of affordable housing.

2 hours ago - WTTW

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Hand Drawing Master Plans

This course aims to provide an introduction into Urban Design Sketching focused on how to hand draw master plans using a mix of colored markers.