Planetizen Store Super Cyber Sale ad
Planetizen - Urban Planning News, Jobs, and Education

Transit Spending on the Ballot in Seattle and Washington

Voters in the city of Seattle will consider a sales tax to fund bus transit service, while voters around the state of Washington will have a chance to send new leaders to Congress.
November 2, 2020, 11am PST | James Brasuell | @CasualBrasuell
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments
King County Metro Transit
TS Photographer

Heidi Groover explains Proposition 1, which asks Seattle voters to approve a 0.15 percent sales tax to fund bus service on the King County Metro system.

"The six-year tax measure would replace an expiring 0.1% sales tax and $60 car-tab fee that raised more than $50 million a year. Prop. 1 would not renew the car-tab fee," explains Groover, referencing the controversial Initiative 976, approved by voters in November 2019 to reduce the cost of annual vehicle licensing fees and thrown out by a judge in October 2010.

According to Groover, Proposition 1 is expected to "test voters’ willingness to approve a tax increase after months of economic uncertainty."

Groover shares details of the spending plan for Proposition 1 released by Mayor Jenny Durkan's office:

In the first three years of the new tax, the city would spend $12 million to $20 million for service on bus routes serving Seattle, according to a spending plan provided by Mayor Jenny Durkan’s office.

That would grow as the economy rebounds, with about $34 million for bus service by 2026. The tax measure requires that starting in 2022, the majority of spending be on Metro-operated service.

For the first four years of the tax, another $5 million to $6 million a year would fund projects city leaders are labeling “emerging needs,” which could be related to COVID-19 or the West Seattle Bridge closure. 

The article includes a lot more detail about how the city would spend the tax revenue if voters decide to approve Proposition 1 tomorrow.

In related election analysis, Gregory Scruggs writes an article about how the election could change infrastructure funding allocations from the federal government to the state of Washington and the Seattle region. Scruggs specifically calls attention to the potential for a version of the $1.5 trillion "Moving Forward Act," approved by House Democrats over the summer, to be revived after the election.

To get an idea of how the candidates for Congressional office might sway the direction of federal infrastructure spending in the years to come, Scruggs provides analysis of the candidates up for election in five Congressional districts in the state of Washington.

Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, October 20, 2020 in The Seattle Times
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email