Candidates drop names for a reason.
Despite campaign platforms and media coverage that have focused with unprecedented intensity on matters related to the built and natural environments, last week's Democrat Candidate debates featured only one signature moment that addressed urban policies: the tit-for-tat between Senator Kamala Harris and former Vice President Joe Biden over bussing policies in Berkeley, California, which has been widely discussed in the media since the debates.
Laura Bliss writes for CityLab to document the other, less ballyhooed mentions of urban policy and specific local contexts throughout the two-day debate event.
Bliss prefaces this analysis with an interesting idea about the way candidates use references to local and regional signifiers to build credibility and recognition with the audience:
On a presidential debate stage, place matters. With a slew of candidates jockeying for breakout moments and, in many cases, introducing themselves to a national audience for the first time, regional identifiers are one of the best sorting mechanisms voters get. But presidential aspirants must balance playing up their hometown roots to tell stories and display their relatability with the need to make sweeping gestures toward national reconciliation. Many reeled off campaign stops to build credibility with unfamiliar regions. Some places appeared as political touchstones, like the locations of recent mass shootings, or synecdoches like “Washington” and “Wall Street.” Certain candidates repeatedly highlighted geography as destiny—but it may be just as telling who abandoned their atlases.
The article includes a map of the specific place references that also indicates the candidates' hometowns, as well as a map of worldwide locations referenced by the candidates. The bulk of the article is devoted to each reference by candidates of specific locations and policies that affect communities.
Under the criteria for the next round of debates, scheduled for July, only 14 of the current candidates would qualify, so the sample size of opinion on matters involving cities from the Democratic candidates for president is bound to start shrinking, and soon. The criteria get even more stringent in September.
FULL STORY: We Mapped Every Place Mentioned by the Democratic Candidates
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
5 New England states march closer to 800 megawatt wind energy project
Securing federal approval for the project may be complicated under the Trump administration, which has historically been hostile towards domestic wind power.
Baltimore to break ground on $50 million Transit Priority Project
The project will bring faster bus trips, safer streets and better bike connections to Baltimore.
Airbnb launches $250 million 'last-dollar financing' housing accelerator, makes first investment in Austin
The company will put $6.4 million towards affordable housing development in Texas’ capital.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association