Connecticut Transportation Funding Debate: Toll Trucks or Toll All Vehicles?

"As your governor, I cannot fix this economy without fixing our transportation system," Democratic Governor Ned Lamont states in a video on his webpage that also includes an op-ed printed in the CT Post on Saturday, Feb. 16, "A Path Forward on Tolling."

On paper, we have it all — access to world-class talent; equidistant between Boston and New York without the exceptionally high cost of living; ... [b]ut our reputation in one area, in particular, precedes us, and not in a good way. Our economic development team must be prepared to answer the question that everyone who knows anything about Connecticut will ask: “What about the congestion on your highways?”

Our proximity in mileage to New York City means nothing if it takes 90 minutes to get there from Stamford on the road, and over an hour by train. We need to not only maintain our aging transportation infrastructure, but it’s high time that we upgrade it, too.

Lamont's problem is that he campaigned in support of a program like the RhodeWorks plan in neighboring Rhode Island, which tolls only tractor-trailers. It may have helped get him elected, as posted after the midterms, "Truck Tolls Wins (Indirectly) on Election Day."

The governor describes in the op-ed why tolling both trucks and passenger vehicles is necessary.

While we are awaiting a ruling from the courts regarding truck-only tolling [ATA v. Alviti Complaint], our attorneys are pretty certain that if permitted, the tolling could only be done on specific bridges and the generated revenue would be reserved for those bridges, not for congestion pricing. Assuming our attorneys are correct, the truck-only option provides too little revenue, too slowly and too piecemeal to make a meaningful difference.

All-vehicle tolling backlash

"Critics of Lamont and opponents of tolls unleashed a firestorm on social media following Lamont’s Op-Ed," writes Connecticut Post reporter Kaitlyn Krasselt in the source article.

They showed anger over tolls — which they argue will place an unfair burden on Connecticut’s low- and middle-class commuters, and will drive business to other states — and they questioned Lamont’s integrity.

A WFSB video shows candidate Lamont pledging that he wouldn't consider all-vehicle tolling and Senate Republican leader Len Fasano opposing the proposal.

Ryan Drajewicz, Gov. Ned Lamont’s chief of staff, dispatched to address the public backlash on Sunday, explains to Krasselt why it was necessary to widen the tolling net to include passenger vehicles, which would capture $800 million annually.

Trucks-only tolling is estimated to bring in $45 million to $200 million, Drajewicz said, and the state Department of Transportation projects $500 million a year is needed just to repair bridges.

However, the truck-only option doesn't appear to have been ruled-out Lamont's 56-second video, which he ends with the governor asking, "I want you to take a look at these two options. I'd love to hear your feedback."

Gas tax hike ruled-out

Lamont writes in his op-ed:

The gasoline tax simply does not provide the reliable revenue we need, period. Gasoline tax revenues have been flat for 10 years and are expected to begin declining as cars become more efficient, and as the sales of electric vehicles increase. As such, I do not support raising the gas tax, as it is already high compared to our peers.

That's no longer the case, according to reporting by Keith M. Phaneuf and Jake Kara of the non-profit Connecticut Mirror on Feb. 1, 2018. They report on a seven-cents per gallon gas tax hike proposed by former Democratic Gov. Dan Malloy.

The American Petroleum Institute currently ranks Connecticut ninth nationally in total state fuel taxes at 39.3 cents per gallon, 5.7 cents higher than the U.S. average. [As of Jan. 1, total state gas taxes are 36.85 cents per gallon.]

In the Northeast, Connecticut ranks third, behind Pennsylvania’s 58.7 cents and New York’s 44.3 cents.

In Wisconsin, new Democratic Gov. Tony Evers wants to hike the gas tax, but the Republican legislature prefers tolls even though there's no guarantee that they would be able to secure permission from the Federal Highway Authority to place the tolls on federal highways. The same uncertainty awaits Lamont in Connecticut.

Related in Planetizen

• Wisconsin Republicans Unite to Support Road Tolling Over Gas Tax Hike, February 11, 2019
• Truck Tolls Wins (Indirectly) on Election Day, November 19, 2018
• Bill to Toll Connecticut Interstates and Parkways Advances, April 12, 2018
• Connecticut Governor's Transportation Plan Raises New Revenue to Fund Road Projects, February 2, 2018:
  Tolls and gas taxes—that's how Connecticut Governor Dannel P. Malloy plans on raising revenue for the state's troubled Special Transportation Fund.
• Gas Tax Woes: A Tale of Two New England States, June 10, 2013

Hat tip to IBTTA Smart Brief.