With speculation that downed power lines and exploding transformers may have caused California's most deadly and destructive wildfires, many question why utility companies don't bury these lines through fire-prone areas.
Burying power lines is not cheap, costing at least twice that of an overhead line. Furthermore, the costs would be borne by the utility's customers, which not the company's profits, reports David R. Baker for the San Francisco Chronicle. And it's not just the utilities that are concerned about the added costs.
“We think it’s so expensive that it’s really not feasible,” said Mark Toney, executive director of The Utility Reform Network watchdog group. [A consumer advocacy organization headquartered in San Francisco].
Research by the Bay Area News Group did find that at least 10 problems were reported with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) lines on the first night of the fires that began on Sunday, Oct. 8, and are expected to be fully contained on Friday, Oct. 27.
Were the power lines responsible for causing the wildfires that have caused 42 deaths, destroyed at least 8,700 structures, and scorched over 245,000 acres [per CNBC on Oct. 26]? "The simple answer is we don’t know yet," writes Geisha Williams, CEO and president of PG&E Corp. in an op-ed for The Chronicle on Oct. 20.
In an opposing op-ed, Jamie Court, president of the nonprofit nonpartisan group Consumer Watchdog, charges PG&E with negligence for their negligence in reducing wildfire risks around their lines, and also takes aim at Gov. Brown and the California Public Utilities Commission over the vetoing a bill last year to mitigate wildfire risks from overhead utility facilities. The CPUC and CAL FIRE are both conducting investigations to determine the cause of the fires.
Baker reports extensively on the costs of undergrounding of power lines in urban areas which is done primarily for aesthetic reasons, and the costs are much higher than those in undeveloped areas.
For 10 years starting in 1996, [San Francisco] worked with PG&E to place underground 45.8 miles of overhead lines, with the utility estimating a cost of $1 million per mile. Instead, the final price came in at $3.8 million per mile [pdf].
Other utilities have been more aggressive in undergrounding power lines, such as much smaller San Diego Gas and Electric Co., a division of Sempra Energy, which has buried 60 percent of its lines, reports Baker.
Read the full story: Underground power lines don’t cause wildfires. But they’re really expensive
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
Nation's most wind-powered state turns to coal as data centers increase energy demand
For the first time in decades, Iowa has increased its generation of coal power.
NYC cools commuters with city's first rain garden above a bus stop
New York City officials say the plants in the rain garden can absorb 16 gallons of rainwater during heavy storms.
Brightline West’s future may rely on $6 billion federal loan
The company has until Nov. 2 to make a $400 million equity investment into its proposed high-speed rail line.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Greater Baltimore Committee
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association