A California state senator has proposed to overhaul California’s cap-and-trade system explains the changes he wants to see.

California successfully defended its cap-and-trade program from a recent legal challenge, but it still has to wrestle with what will happen when the program expires in 2020—especially since the state emissions reduction target extends to 2030.
One proposal, from Senator Bob Wieckowski, is to essentially replace the current system with a new version of cap and trade that would change both how carbon is priced and how the revenues are spent. In The Planning Report, Wieckowski describes the three broad categories of investment his plan would create: climate research, infrastructure adaptation, and a new consumer program called "climate dividends."
"When we set a cap, there is necessarily going to be an increase in the price of gasoline and carbon-based products," he explains. "The idea is to return some of the money generated to the consumer, to ease the increased direct costs that we anticipate."
He also wants to see the state's investment in infrastructure shift to prioritize the upgrade or even relocation of basic facilities like sewers and roads, especially in disadvantaged communities.
Some of these facilities are located in areas that are endangered by sea-level rise and climate change. As we rebuild them, it may not be possible to simply fortify the surrounding ground. They may actually have to be moved to, for lack of a better term, higher ground. That’s quite a change from how we’re using cap-and-trade funds right now.
New technologies and innovations, meanwhile, would be explored through a third bucket of money dedicated to researching best climate adaptation practices. That approach speaks to Wieckowski's broader vision of where California fits into the global effort toward resilience.
"California's forte is the export of problem-solving ideas and devices that can help out the rest of the world," he says. Especially in light of the Trump administration's "disinterest" in climate action, he says, "People are looking for answers from us. How California goes, the world wants to go."
FULL STORY: State Senator Wieckowski Offers Alternative to Post-2020 Cap and Trade

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions