The Red River Diversion project, also known as the Fargo-Moorhead Flood Risk Management project, has full federal approval but was recently denied a critical permit by the state. This op-ed questions the wisdom of the state's action.
Nick Sortland opines about the Red River Diversion, "a project designed by the Army Corps of Engineers’ St. Paul office, funded by Congress and signed off by the Obama administration to allow the Fargo metropolitan area permanent flood protection from the increasingly unpredictable Red River."
According to Sortland, climate change has led to extreme and unpredictable flooding on the Red River, precipitating the need for the diversion project in and around the city. The diversion channel, according to Sortland, would also wall off the footprint for Fargo's potential sprawl.
Despite the federal approvals and the environmental case for the project, however, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources denied a permit application for the proposed project, which it calls the Fargo-Moorhead Flood Risk Management project. The state cited three primary reasons for the denial:
- Because the land protected would rural and sparsely developed, the "project does not meet the requirement to be reasonable, practical, protect public safety and promote public welfare."
- "The project is not consistent with some state and local land use and water management plans in the project area."
- "Mitigation, monitoring and adaptive management needs remain that have not been sufficiently addressed."
Returning to the original argument in favor of the project, Sortland claims that historic precedent, climate change science, and the area's ongoing growth demand that the project move forward.
FULL STORY: Why Minnesota should support, not obstruct, Fargo-Moorhead’s permanent flood protection
Coming Soon to Ohio: The Largest Agrivoltaic Farm in the US
The ambitious 6,000-acre project will combine an 800-watt solar farm with crop and livestock production.
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause
A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.
Dallas Surburb Bans New Airbnbs
Plano’s city council banned all new permits for short-term rentals as concerns about their impacts on housing costs grow.
Divvy Introduces E-Bike Charging Docks
New, circular docks let e-bikes charge at stations, eliminating the need for frequent battery swaps.
How Freeway Projects Impact Climate Resilience
In addition to displacement and public health impacts, highway expansions can also make communities less resilient to flooding and other climate-related disasters.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.