The Red River Diversion project, also known as the Fargo-Moorhead Flood Risk Management project, has full federal approval but was recently denied a critical permit by the state. This op-ed questions the wisdom of the state's action.

Nick Sortland opines about the Red River Diversion, "a project designed by the Army Corps of Engineers’ St. Paul office, funded by Congress and signed off by the Obama administration to allow the Fargo metropolitan area permanent flood protection from the increasingly unpredictable Red River."
According to Sortland, climate change has led to extreme and unpredictable flooding on the Red River, precipitating the need for the diversion project in and around the city. The diversion channel, according to Sortland, would also wall off the footprint for Fargo's potential sprawl.
Despite the federal approvals and the environmental case for the project, however, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources denied a permit application for the proposed project, which it calls the Fargo-Moorhead Flood Risk Management project. The state cited three primary reasons for the denial:
- Because the land protected would rural and sparsely developed, the "project does not meet the requirement to be reasonable, practical, protect public safety and promote public welfare."
- "The project is not consistent with some state and local land use and water management plans in the project area."
- "Mitigation, monitoring and adaptive management needs remain that have not been sufficiently addressed."
Returning to the original argument in favor of the project, Sortland claims that historic precedent, climate change science, and the area's ongoing growth demand that the project move forward.
FULL STORY: Why Minnesota should support, not obstruct, Fargo-Moorhead’s permanent flood protection

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage
Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

The 120 Year Old Tiny Home Villages That Sheltered San Francisco’s Earthquake Refugees
More than a century ago, San Francisco mobilized to house thousands of residents displaced by the 1906 earthquake. Could their strategy offer a model for the present?

LA’s Tree Emergency Goes Beyond Vandalism
After a vandal destroyed dozens of downtown LA trees, Mayor Karen Bass vowed to replace them. Days later, she slashed the city’s tree budget.

Sacramento Leads Nation With Bus-Mounted Bike Lane Enforcement Cameras
The city is the first to use its bus-mounted traffic enforcement system to cite drivers who park or drive in bike lanes.

Seattle Voters Approve Social Housing Referendum
Voters approved a corporate tax to fund the city’s housing authority despite an opposition campaign funded by Amazon and Microsoft.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Ada County Highway District
Clanton & Associates, Inc.
Jessamine County Fiscal Court
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service