The transportation research group, TRIP, tallied costs from additional crashes, higher operating costs, and congestion that result from insufficient investment in California's roads and bridges. A new effort was launched to increase state funding.
Insufficient investment in California's road system is by no means a new revelation. Gov. Jerry Brown announced his priority to tackle "the enormous $59 billion problem of deferred highway and bridge maintenance" in his 2015 joint inauguration and state of the state address.
A year later, the deficit had swelled to $77 billion. And it didn't help that California's gas tax decreased by 2.2 cents per gallon on July 1, the third consecutive year the Board of Equalization voted to reduce the tax. In the face of falling gas tax revenues, the California Transportation Commission announced on Jan. 22 that it would slash spending by $754 million on current projects over five years.
The 24-page report [PDF], released Aug. 17 on the state of California's road and bridges by TRIP (formerly The Road Information Program), a private, nonprofit national transportation research group based in Washington, D.C., is helpful in that it quantifies some of the costs that motorists pay when infrastructure investment falls way behind. In the Bay Area and Southern California, costs to motorists averaged over $2,800 annually.
"Roads and bridges that are deficient, congested or lack desirable safety features cost California motorists a total of $53.6 billion statewide annually," reports Rocky Moretti, Director of Policy and Research for TRIP.
The TRIP report finds that 37 percent of major locally and state-maintained roads are in poor condition. One quarter of California’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete.
The group breaks out costs into three areas:
- Higher vehicle operating costs,
- Traffic crashes
- Congestion-related delays.
The report details costs for five regions, which have their own press releases:
- Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana urban area
- Sacramento area
- San Diego area
- San Francisco-Oakland urban area
- San Jose urban area
New legislation will tackle infrastructure deficit
To address these costs, the chairs of the Assembly and Senate Transportation Committees announced plans on Aug. 17 to increase transportation funding by hiking fuel taxes to raise $7.4 billion.
"The plan, highlighted by an increase of 17 cents per gallon in the gas tax, comes from Assemblyman Jim Frazier (D-Oakley, Contra Costa County) and Sen. Jim Beall (D-San Jose) in an attempt to unify the disparate proposals the pair had previously introduced in their respective houses," reported Liam Dillon for the Los Angeles Times on Aug. 17. In addition, the proposal, which has yet to be introduced as a bill, includes:
- A diesel tax increase of 30 cents per gallon, also indexed to inflation
- $165 annual fee for zero-emission vehicles
As of Aug. 9, California's gas tax of 38.57 cents per gallon [per API (PDF)] is the fifth highest in the nation after Pennsylvania, Washington, New York and Hawaii.
Hat tip to AASHTO Journal.
Read the full story: Deficient, Congested Roadways Cost California Drivers $53.6 Billion Annually
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
Bay area voters pass ‘crucial lifeline’ for transit
Proposition RTM, which will fund Bay Area transit, has approval from 61% of voters as of 9:45 p.m. on Nov. 3.
Voters across the country reject data centers
Dozens of communities voted on measures to restrict the buildout of data centers.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority