Op-Ed: Transit-Oriented Gentrification Should Be Taxed

This piece from the Vancouver Sun advocates using land value capture taxes to fund transit and related improvements. Such a tax would target speculation, the author writes, rather than productive activity.
August 1, 2015, 7am PDT | Philip Rojc | @PhilipRojc
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments
Michael Andersen

In the wake of a local vote against regressive tax hikes to fund transit, Paul Finch considers another way. "Land Value Capture, also known as an Area Benefiting Tax. To translate in plain terms: pay for transit improvements by taxing some of the property appreciation that those improvements produce."

In essence, land value capture would cut into the profits of developers speculating on transit-oriented gentrification. "Public infrastructure causes windfall gains for nearby property owners and developers. We could finance construction through government bonds, then repay those bonds over time with an incrementally higher property tax on nearby developable sites."

Finch argues that taxing higher land values doesn't significantly harm the economy. "Such a scheme has no 'dead weight loss' — that is, unlike income and sales taxes, it doesn't stifle the economy and taxes speculation rather than productive activity."

Transit's critics often deride its tendency to operate in the red, at least as far as fare revenues go. Land value capture has the potential to make transit's beneficiaries pay for what they're getting. 

Full Story:
Published on Friday, July 10, 2015 in The Vancouver Sun
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email