Learn today, plan for tomorrow.
Sign up for news and offers from Planetizen Courses, the online learning platform for planners.
This report benchmarks the use of technology in city planning departments across the United States as of October 2014, suggests gold standards for using technology in planning, and predicts how technology trends will impact planning departments in 2015-2016.
Emerging technologies are fundamentally changing how we plan, develop, and manage our urban areas. Planning professionals are increasingly being called on to adopt new technologies to plan, communicate planning concepts, and engage citizens in the planning process.
The set of technology tools that planning departments use to publish planning information has become increasingly well defined over the last several years. Most planning departments now publish the zoning code and general or comprehensive plan online. A smaller number provide sophisticated online geographic information systems.
However, other key aspects of public accessibility are less clearly defined. Examples of these metrics include whether the planning department's website is optimized for mobile and tablet devices, the reading level of the content, the use of social media, the frequency of website updates, online permitting, and more.
We developed a subjective list of 12 key indicators for city planning departments and then evaluated the planning department websites of over 500 cities across the United States between May and July of 2014. This data was then aggregated to produce the findings of this benchmarking survey.
For the purpose of our analysis, we classify cities into cohorts for analysis. Cities with population less than 100,000 are classified as small, those between 100,000-199,000 as medium, and those greater than 200,000 as large.
For more information about our methodology, please see the full methodology in Appendix 1.
Of the 527 cities we evaluated, 523 (99 percent) had a dedicated page, collection of pages, or website for their planning department. The 1 percent of city planning departments without websites was excluded from further analysis.
Modern web publishing uses content management systems to facilitate the process of publishing content. Years ago, in order to publish on the web, the author needed to have some programming abilities. Today, the trend is for websites to be built using content management systems, which separates the programming of the website from the ability to publish content. By using a content management system, authors can add, edit, and delete content and images on a website using a web interface.
We identified content management platforms used by planning department websites using the Wappalyzer tool (see Appendix 2, Tools).
Most (64 percent) city planning websites were custom-developed websites*. Another 23 percent of sites are using a content management system, including 10 percent using a major content management system such as Drupal, WordPress, Joomla, or DotNetNuke. Of those using a major content management system, the open source Drupal (4 percent) was the most popular.
A minority of sites (13 percent) were static, implying that the site was manually updated.
* It is possible that some of these 64 percent of custom city planning websites were using a content management system that we were unable to discern.
Traffic from mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets has growing quickly since 2011, now representing approximately 25 percent of all web traffic. Mobile computing will continue to accelerate; we predict more people will access the Internet via mobile phones and tablets than desktop computers by the end of 2015.
Responsive web design is the gold standard for building a website that adapts its presentation to the device on which it is being viewed. Responsive design has emerged as the preferred approach for building a single website that is accessible on multiple devices, from desktop computers to smartphones.
Of the 523 planning department websites we evaluated, 15 percent have adopted responsive web design techniques.
Use of social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn have gained popularity as another set of channels to communicate with stakeholders. We evaluated city planning departments to determine if they had set up a Facebook page, Twitter account, or LinkedIn group dedicated to the department.
Planning departments in cities with a population over 200,00 have been most active in adopting some form of social media site dedicated to planning.
We speculate that the increased use among larger cities also relates to how social media tools work suit the needs of complex urban organizations comprised of many divisions with varying needs. Also, the higher staffing levels of larger planning departments may be necessary to support social media efforts.
A lot of the Internet’s content is published in a format that appears as text in your web browser. That content is generally called HTML, regardless of the range of technologies used to deliver this content. However, it is also possible to provide content on the web using other formats, such as portable document format (PDF) or Microsoft Word (Word) formats. These non-HTML formats have their place, but are often inconvenient to read on mobile devices, difficult to search, and generally decrease usability of web content.
Using Google Advanced Search (see appendix 2, Tools) we determined that on average most city planning department websites have 12 percent or less of their content in PDF or Word format.
The level at which documents are written impacts the ease with which those documents can be read and understood. Using Google Advanced Search (see Tools) we determined the average for basic, intermediate, and advanced reading levels of content on city planning department websites.
Of the 523 websites we evaluated, 85 percent of the content is presented at an intermediate reading level, which matches the U.S. national average. Five percent of content is presented at a basic level, while 6 percent is at an advanced level.
According to usability expert Jakob Nielson, websites targeted toward the general public should aim to provide information at the 6th grade reading level.
By comparison, content on the health-related information website health.com is at 53 percent basic and 47 percent intermediate readability. Similarly, webmd.com content is at 40 percent basic and 60 percent intermediate readability.
The authority to zone is central to the role of most planning departments. We evaluated whether cities maintained an online version of the zoning code, and the format in which the zoning code was presented.
The gold standard for zoning code usability is presented in HTML format, is mobile responsive, and is fully searchable. Zoning codes in portable document format (PDF) are generally less desirable, especially PDFs that have been scanned from printed documents, which typically renders the content of the zoning code unsearchable.
Of the 523 websites we evaluated, 83 percent of sites had the zoning code available in some format; 34 percent were verifiably searchable.
Zoning codes are typically complex documents that are updated on a monthly or annual basis. This complexity has resulted in a trend to outsource zoning code management to companies that provide management and publishing of municipal codes, or to publish the latest version of the document as a PDF.
However, as with the use of content management systems for web publishing, there appears to be emerging innovation in the development of software for cities to manage their own zoning code. For cities that offered the zoning code online, we evaluated how the zoning code was published.
Of the 523 websites we evaluated, 31 percent of cities that published the zoning code did so on the city’s website. Among cities that hosted their website somewhere else, the most popular service was Municode (31 percent), followed by the AM Legal service (7 percent).
The general or comprehensive plan defines the range of acceptable land uses within a city. We evaluated whether the general plan was available on the planning department’s website as well as the format of the document.
As with zoning codes, the gold standard for general plan usability is presented in HTML format, is mobile responsive, and is fully searchable. General plans in portable document format (PDF) are generally less desirable.
Of the 523 city planning department websites we evaluated, 10 percent offered the general plan in an HTML format, including 3 percent that were also fully searchable. 69 percent of cities offered a PDF version of the document, while 21 percent did not offer the general or comprehensive plan online.
Published updates by the planning department about its activities can signal the department’s interest in engaging with the public. We evaluated city planning department websites to attempt to discover the last visible website updated performed by the department.
We found that 53 percent of city planning websites have been visibly updated within the last month. Another 29 percent had been visibly updated within the last two to five months, while 18 percent of the websites had not been visibly updated within the last six months.
The ability to look up information about a specific property is often provided by the city, county, or other agency. However, the availability of parcel-level detail online is an indicator that the city has invested in a web-based geographic information system (GIS) and that the planning department has access to potentially sophisticated land use analysis and mapping capabilities.
For our analysis we evaluated if the planning department had offered, in some form, an online property lookup tool on its website. 40 percent of planning websites offered this feature, with higher adoption of these tools in the West (37 percent) and South (35 percent), and lower adoption in the Midwest (19 percent) and Northeast (10 percent).
The gold standard for an online property lookup is a web-based geographic information system that is mobile responsive, provides a user interface that is easy to learn for non-GIS professionals, and enables users to perform common searches, such as looking up a resident’s property, finding zoning information, and potentially identifying available properties to stimulate economic development.
We anticipate that online geographic information systems providing property lookup tools for cities will be a growth area for planning practice and technology companies.
The authority of the planning or building department to issue permits for building or modifying structures is central to the role of most cities. Traditionally, permits are issued at the planning counter in a manual process. Emerging technologies and a broader reliance on e-commerce as an acceptable and desired alternative to face-to-face transactions are beginning to impact how planning departments perform permitting transactions.
We evaluated whether online permitting was available on the websites of the planning departments under study. The majority (79 percent) do not support online permitting. Of the 21 percent that do provide online permitting, there is greater adoption among smaller and larger cities, with less adoption among cities in the medium cohort (populations between 100,000 - 199,000).
We anticipate that this will be a growth area for cities and that we will see more opportunity for online transactions in the future.
Emerging technologies are fundamentally changing how we plan, develop, and manage our urban areas. Benchmarking which technologies are being used in city planning departments across the United States enables us to evaluate future trends.
Based on our evaluation of data collected in June 2014 and our familiarity with the use of technology to support city planning departments, we make the following observations about the use of web technologies in city planning departments:
William (Billy) Riggs, PhD is an Assistant Professor of City & Regional Planning and a leader in the area of transportation planning and technology, having worked as a practicing planner and published widely in the area. He has over 50 publications and has had his work featured nationally by Dr. Richard Florida in The Atlantic. He is also the principal author of Planetizen's Planning Web Technology Benchmarking Project. He can be found on Twitter @williamwriggs.
The authors would like to thank UCLA undergraduate Megyn Rugh, who served as a research assistant on the project; CalPoly, San Luis Obispo Planning Information Systems (CRP 457) students, who conducted preliminary data gathering; and Urban Insight staff Olga Serhijchuk and James Brasuell, who assisted with data validation and editing, respectively.
We developed a subjective list of 12 key indicators for city planning departments and then evaluated the websites of over 500 cities across the United States between May and July of 2014. This data was then aggregated to produce the findings of this benchmarking survey. For more information about our methodology, please evaluate the methodology appendix.
Cities were derived from the full list of designated places assessed in the U.S. Census Bureau’s 1-year American Community Survey results (N=561 based on 2012 ACS 1-year estimates). The total represented U.S. urban areas both large and small (greater than 65,000). It also offered the capability of reputable and repeatable sourcing method tied to existing demographic data in the communities evaluated.
Typically, the most current data is found in the 1-year estimates, although they lack the precision of five-year estimates, which was appropriate with our goals of benchmarking the up-to-date characteristics of web technology in planning organizations throughout the United States. After gathering this data we filtered out 33 places with a Census Subdivision designation, which usually includes unincorporated areas that are classified as distinct places (N=528). The respective sample achieved a statistically significant result at the 95th confidence interval with a margin of error of less than +/- 3 percent.
Data for each city was gathered by student researchers. Data was then refined and validated by the research team. The results were then checked for accuracy by an independent source. Following this we used descriptive statistics and crosstabs to make observations about trends in web use in planning firms throughout the United States. As indicated in the introduction this was done with a eye not only toward national trends but to evaluating technology use by city size and geography.
A histogram of the cities is provided in Figure 1. Given the distribution we classified cities into cohorts for analysis. Cities less than 100,000 are classified as small, those between 100,000 and 199,000 as medium, and those greater than 200,000 as large. This taxonomy is consistent with other work indicating that cities beyond 200,000 may have much different socio-economic dynamics than cities that are significantly smaller—a factor which could contribute to differences in technology adoption and use.
To determine the web platform a website was running on we used Wappalyzer, which identifies different technologies being used by a website. It is available as an add-on for Firefox and Chrome web browsers.
Here is a screenshot of Wappalyzer identifying web technologies used by the LSC website.
To determine percent of website's pages in PDF or DOC and to determine content readability levels, we used the Google's Advanced Search feature.
First determine the total number of pages on a website by specifying the website URL and hitting search. Google will report the total count of URLs visible. To determine filetype, specify site or domain and file type.
To determine reading level, specify site and select "annotate results with reading levels" for reading level.