In EPA’s leadership blog, Administrator Gina McCarthy announces the agency's new standards to reduce the sulfur content in gasoline by 60% in 2017 and new Tier 3 emission standards for cars and light trucks to reduce criteria and toxic air pollutants
"The new Tier 3 (tailpipe) standards will also slash of a range of harmful pollutants that can cause premature death and respiratory illnesses. They will reduce smog-forming volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) by 80%, establish a 70% tighter particulate matter standard (PM2.5), and virtually eliminate fuel vapor emissions," writes McCarthy mostly about what are known as "criteria air pollutants", as opposed to greenhouse gas emissions. [NOX is in both categories].
In addition to improving public health, Todd Spangler of the Detroit Free Press writes that the reduced sulfur standards in gasoline "helps emission control equipment on cars and trucks perform better". McCarthy notes that applies to both "existing vehicles and on new ones."
From a political perspective, the auto industry alligned itself with environmentalists, while the energy industry stood alone in opposition to the new standards. The American Petroleum Institute claimed the new EPA gasoline regulations are costly and counterproductive, "raising gas prices 10 cents a gallon", writes Alicia Mundy of The Wall Street Journal.
Speaking with reporters Monday, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy disagreed with that assessment, saying the increase would likely be less than one cent a gallon.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which includes 12 of the largest makers, supported the new rules. Mike Robinson, a GM vice president, said the rules effectively harmonize federal and various state vehicle-emissions requirements, such as California's. "The benefit from our standpoint is that you get to do this once, instead of several times," he said.
Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, writes that the new standards are "good news for everyone, but it's especially important for families who live near a major road. According to the American Lung Association, living or working near a major roadway results in a greater risk of health problems, especially for children and teenagers."
Read the full story: Cleaner Cars, Cleaner Fuels, and a Cleaner Bill of Health
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority