Presenting the case of New York's High Line, student Sahra Mirbabaee questions who benefits from the city's investments.

New York City’s 1.45-mile long High Line was a costly public endeavor, Mirbabaee writes. Following the project’s first two installments, which cost a reported $152.3 million, its third is expected to cost an additional $86.2 million. This is to be accompanied by annual operating costs ranging between $2 million -$4 million. For Miarbabaee, however, the public investment – which funded half of the project – has been more than questionable.
Although attracting praise from architects, planners, and visitors alike, the High Line has been a source of considerable trouble for nearby residents. By fueling gentrification, Mirbabaee argues that the project raised living costs in the areas around the High Line and forced many local residents to leave their homes.
For Mirbabaee, there is a “troubling irony” in the project’s aesthetic, which “…exudes a ‘cool’ image of feigned neglect.” “Commodifying ostensibly lower-class spaces for supposedly higher classes,” Mirbabaee continues, “is both patronizing and divisive.”
There is a fundamental need to pose the question of who benefits from the city’s investments, argues Mirbabaee. Given Mayor Bloomberg’s recent proposal to cut $170 million from the city’s childcare services funding, Mirbabaee suspects a case of “disproportionate public investment in real estate”.
“Reversing this misappropriation of funds,” Mirbabaee writes, “would allow us all to build more vibrant neighborhoods than the High Line’s designers could ever have imagined.”
FULL STORY: Poverty below the high line

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage
Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Why Should We Subsidize Public Transportation?
Many public transit agencies face financial stress due to rising costs, declining fare revenue, and declining subsidies. Transit advocates must provide a strong business case for increasing public transit funding.

Understanding Road Diets
An explainer from Momentum highlights the advantages of reducing vehicle lanes in favor of more bike, transit, and pedestrian infrastructure.

New California Law Regulates Warehouse Pollution
A new law tightens building and emissions regulations for large distribution warehouses to mitigate air pollution and traffic in surrounding communities.

Phoenix Announces Opening Date for Light Rail Extension
The South Central extension will connect South Phoenix to downtown and other major hubs starting on June 7.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Caltrans
Smith Gee Studio
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service