SPUR, the San Francisco-based planing think tank, looks at the potential benefits to the public sector of using dynamic, demand-based pricing to manage limited public resources - from parking to electricity.
You're probably familiar with dynamic pricing as it's applied to the shifting cost of individual seats on an airplane, but a market-based approach to better match fixed supplies to fluctuations in demand is slowly catching on in the public sector too, reports Laura Tam. "Sometimes called demand-based pricing or real-time pricing, this is a
more efficient way of allocating publicly provided or regulated goods," says Tam,
"especially those that are subject to wide fluctuations in demand over a
short period of time, such as within an hour or a day. By judging
people's willingness to pay for a publicly provided service - such as
electricity, road space or parking - demand-based pricing enables a more
nimble match-up of supply and demand than has previously been possible. "
With the potential for public benefits in economic efficiency, development of revenue streams, and limiting of environmental impacts, technology is finally making dynamic pricing a possibility for public agencies. According to Tam, "[a] combination of new sensory and computing technologies,
two-way communications and devices that both create and analyze large
volumes of data can now measure and communicate real-time demand. This
information can be used to automate price signals for resources, such as
at smart parking meters. In some cases, it can also be used to remotely
trigger a certain action, such as powering down preselected devices
during periods of peak electricity demand."
Such pricing models are not without their challenges, however, including the potential for higher prices to have a bigger impact on people
with lower incomes. As such, says Tam, "[a]ny demand-based pricing scheme for public goods
must be designed to mitigate disproportionate impacts as much as
possible, especially with goods that were previously 'free.'"
FULL STORY: Smart Cities, Limited Resources

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.

Can We Please Give Communities the Design They Deserve?
Often an afterthought, graphic design impacts everything from how we navigate a city to how we feel about it. One designer argues: the people deserve better.

The EV “Charging Divide” Plaguing Rural America
With “the deck stacked” against rural areas, will the great electric American road trip ever be a reality?

Judge Halts Brooklyn Bike Lane Removal
Lawyers must prove the city was not acting “arbitrarily, capriciously, and illegally” in ordering the hasty removal.

Engineers Gave America's Roads an Almost Failing Grade — Why Aren't We Fixing Them?
With over a trillion dollars spent on roads that are still falling apart, advocates propose a new “fix it first” framework.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Borough of Carlisle
Smith Gee Studio
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)