The details of drastic reductions to the proposed building program for Austin’s Project Connect long-range transit plan are now open for public comment.

The Austin Transit Partnership (ATP), the government corporation empowered to finance and develop the Project Connect long-term transit plan in Austin has released a proposed revision of the plan, as promised after cost increases forced reductions to the plan.
Nathan Bernier reports for KUT on the revisions, which were leaked earlier this month, but made public on Tuesday, March 21 at a public meeting at the Austin Public Library.
ATP has spent months paring down Project Connect in preparation for the release this week. After seeing the costs for the Project Connect program balloon from an estimated $5.8 billion to $10.3 billion, the plan would now spend less than $5 billion, “including a whopping 40% cost contingency,” reports Bernier.
The ATP hopes a $3.5 billion cushion “will make its pitch more appealing to the federal government,” which is expected to fund up top half of the cost included in the Project Connect program.
The source article, linked below, includes details for each of the five remaining alternatives—all of which represent a significant reduction from the original plan Austin voters approved in the November 2020 election. The original plan called for two new light rail lines, four new rapid bus routes, and a new commuter rail line, as well as expanded service on the city’s existing commuter rail route, in addition to anti-displacement measures and on-demand transit shuttles.
Additional challenges could still await Project Connect if conservative members of the Texas State Legislature manage to approve a proposed bill that would limit ATP’s powers to finance projects. “The Austin Transit Partnership will collect public feedback over the next six weeks,” according to Bernier.
FULL STORY: Austin's light-rail plans have shrunk. Here are 5 new options.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions