California and Massachusetts use the same name for climate change legislation, Global Warming Solutions Act, and set the same target date for reductions, 2020. Both achieved their targets 2016, but the Bay State had a tougher goal to meet.
The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2008 (aka Chapter 298) was signed into law by Mass. Gov. Deval Patrick (D). See (and listen to) Adam Reilly's July 2017 WGBH interview on WGBH of Sen. Marc R. Pacheco (D-Taunton), the law's author, and David Ismay, a senior attorney at the Conservation Law Foundation, which successfully took the state to court, for background on the landmark law.
The Massachusetts law is stronger than California's Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (aka Assembly Bill 32) in two important ways:
- It calls for greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions "between 10 percent and 25 percent below statewide 1990 GHG emission levels by 2020," while AB 32 just called for reduction to "1990 levels."
- It set a future target date of "80 percent below statewide 1990 GHG emission levels by 2050."
It it true that both California Govs. Schwarzenegger (R) and Brown (D) did call for the same 2050 goal, but those were in the form of executive orders [S-3-05 (pdf) and B-30-15, respectively] as opposed to legislation. Senate Bill 32, approved by the legislature in 2016, extended California's climate law to 2030, calling for reductions to 40 percent below 1990 levels.
Benjamin Swasey of WBUR reports on Jan. 4 that greenhouse gas emissions in Massachusetts declined 2.5 percent in 2016, the year of the most recent greenhouse gas inventory, from 2015. According to the Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), emissions decreased by 21% between 1990 and 2016.
By contrast, it was widely reported last July that California had reduced its 2016 emissions, also its most recent GHG inventory, to 1990 levels, meeting its AB 32 goal four years early.
Transportation is tops
Another similarity between the two states – the transportation sector is the largest source of emissions, at 39 percent in Massachusetts and 41 percent in California.
Last month, the Bay State joined with eight other East Coast states and the District of Columbia to develop a policy to price emissions from transportation, set a 'cap' on them, and invest the revenues in low carbon transportation solutions, similar to what California has been doing since 2015 when transportation fuel was added to the cap-and-trade program.
Additional reading: "Climate Change Law in California and Massachusetts: Lessons for State Policy Makers" [pdf], Hastings Environmental Law Journal, Jan 1, 2015.
Read the full story: The State's Emissions Declined 2.5 Percent In 2016. They're Now 21 Percent Below 1990 Levels
California Achieved its Climate Goal; Now the Hard Part Begins
New York Times climate reporter, Brad Plumer, comments on California's landmark accomplishment in reducing emissions, observing that with the low-hanging electricity generation fruit picked, reducing transportation emissions will prove formidable.
California Progress Report: GDP Increases While GHGs Fall
California is demonstrating that improving the economy and the environment go hand in hand. A new inventory report from the state's Air Resources Board notes changes in gross domestic product, population, and greenhouse gas emissions since 2000.
Another Key Climate Bill Lost in California
On the heels of losing an oil reduction mandate due to lobbying by Big Oil, another key climate bill failed to pass—setting greenhouse gas reduction targets beyond 2020. An oil pipeline safety bill resulting from Santa Barbara spill passed.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority