The well-documented concept has yet to catch on in state departments of transportation, but acknowledging it could dramatically transform U.S. transportation policy.

Despite frequent and repeated evidence that adding roadway capacity attracts more drivers, Jake Blumgart examines why the concept of induced demand remains a 'hard sell' for many policymakers and transportation professionals.
"Induced demand has been theorized for almost 100 years, formally studied beginning in the 1960s, and quantitatively measured in the 1990s and the early 21st century. This basic concept is key to understanding congestion relief, which is arguably the central policy goal of American transportation planning." Yet the somewhat counterintuitive idea remains "one of the least understood concepts in transportation policy," Blumgart writes, with the consequences apparent in transportation planning and projects across the country.
Blumgart describes how the phenomenon works—essentially, "If the speed of traffic in a given network increases, that prompts people to drive more"— and why it's hard to understand—a combination of intuition and decades of road expansion presented as the solution to traffic, including by transportation engineers. "An entire industry has been built up around endless road expansion and advocacy organizations like the American Society of Civil Engineers are skilled lobbyists for continuing current practices."
Meanwhile, politicians are afraid to reject road expansion proposals and their immediate effects on congestion in favor of long-term planning and unpopular, but effective, alternatives like congestion pricing.
In a future article in the same Governing series, Blumgart will describe how induced demand could change policy in state DOTs.
FULL STORY: Why the Concept of Induced Demand Is a Hard Sell

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)