A proposal to widen I-35 has drawn criticism from community members who want to see the city shift away from car-centric development.
Austinites are engaged in a heated debate over the Capital Express Project, a controversial "$7.5 billion plan to expand the abhorred stretch of I-35 that snakes through the center of Austin" by adding two levels of tunnels and adding several new lanes. As reported by David Leffler, transportation advocates argue that the plan is "the blueprint for an ineffective, outdated strategy that would only spur sprawl" and induce more traffic and car-centric development. "If allowed to move forward, TxDOT’s proposed expansion will engulf nearly 150 homes and businesses along the interstate."
Opponents of the expansion plan have proposed several alternatives. "For context, there are three community-drawn proposals that would limit the highway’s existing footprint, downsize it to an urban boulevard, or even incorporate Klyde Warren–inspired green spaces, but the state has shown little interest in entertaining them."
Yet just two years ago, "Austin voters approved a $7 billion mass transit bond," signaling that "residents don't want bigger highways." Austin Mayor Pro Tem Natasha Harper-Madison says city leaders must "understand that [the project] will impact so many core aspects of our city’s future" and "make a careful, informed, and thoughtful decision." Harper-Madison encourages residents to participate in TxDOT's public comment period "because transportation touches so many parts of our daily lives, from the way we explore our cities and the neighbors we live nearby to our ability to connect with people from different communities, income levels, and cultures."
Read the full story: “No wider, no higher”: Inside Austin’s red-hot fight over I-35 expansion
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement
The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.
Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion
Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.
NYC DOT wants faster, more permanent street upgrades
The city is examining ways to build more concrete infrastructure without getting entangled in 'decades-long' projects.
'Something we’ve never seen before:' rising utility rates could strain city finances nationwide
Data centers, climate change and other factors have caused utility rates in the United States to increase by 38% since 2020.
Trump to overrule local leaders, lease millions of acres of America’s Pacific Island territories’ seafloors to mining companies
International law says that the Indigenous people of America’s territories have a right to prior and informed consent regarding projects that impact their countries.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
KFH Group Inc.
Greater Baltimore Committee
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello