A proposal to widen I-35 has drawn criticism from community members who want to see the city shift away from car-centric development.

Austinites are engaged in a heated debate over the Capital Express Project, a controversial "$7.5 billion plan to expand the abhorred stretch of I-35 that snakes through the center of Austin" by adding two levels of tunnels and adding several new lanes. As reported by David Leffler, transportation advocates argue that the plan is "the blueprint for an ineffective, outdated strategy that would only spur sprawl" and induce more traffic and car-centric development. "If allowed to move forward, TxDOT’s proposed expansion will engulf nearly 150 homes and businesses along the interstate."
Opponents of the expansion plan have proposed several alternatives. "For context, there are three community-drawn proposals that would limit the highway’s existing footprint, downsize it to an urban boulevard, or even incorporate Klyde Warren–inspired green spaces, but the state has shown little interest in entertaining them."
Yet just two years ago, "Austin voters approved a $7 billion mass transit bond," signaling that "residents don't want bigger highways." Austin Mayor Pro Tem Natasha Harper-Madison says city leaders must "understand that [the project] will impact so many core aspects of our city’s future" and "make a careful, informed, and thoughtful decision." Harper-Madison encourages residents to participate in TxDOT's public comment period "because transportation touches so many parts of our daily lives, from the way we explore our cities and the neighbors we live nearby to our ability to connect with people from different communities, income levels, and cultures."
FULL STORY: “No wider, no higher”: Inside Austin’s red-hot fight over I-35 expansion

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.

In These Cities, Most New Housing is Under 441 Square Feet
With loosened restrictions on “micro-housing,” tiny units now make up as much as 66% of newly constructed housing.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)