Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
Did Uber Just Get Away With Manslaughter?
Herzberg had stepped off a center median mid-block, walking her bicycle into a lane of traffic at 10 pm on March 18 when she was struck by the Volvo XC90 SUV test vehicle traveling 38 mph, three miles per hour over the speed limit.
The Tempe Police had initially determined the crash may have been unavoidable, just the type of incident that autonomous technology is supposed to prevent had it been working properly, which it deliberately wasn't (see below).
"The Yavapai County Attorney’s Office, which reviewed the case [at the request of the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, which had a potential conflict of interest in the case], said in a letter dated Monday [March 4] that there was 'no basis for criminal liability for the Uber corporation,'” reports Mihir Zaveri for The New York Times.
The incident placed the spotlight not only on self-driving technology but the human "testers" that are supposed to perform as a safety check should the autonomous technology fail.
In June, the Tempe Police Department released a report that said the safety driver was streaming the television show “The Voice” on her phone in the minutes leading up to the crash, The Arizona Republic reported.
Disabled automatic braking technology
A preliminary National Transportation Safety Board report about the crash adopted on May 24 found that "a built-in emergency braking system had been disabled while the car was in autonomous mode to ensure a smoother ride," reported Daisuke Wakabayashi for The Times.
A recent post on the increase in pedestrian fatalities last year also included test results from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute on automatic emergency braking systems that can detect and brake for pedestrians. The technology worked well for 9 of 11 SUVs equipped with the technology.
"The NTSB preliminary report "also affirmed what many experts on self-driving cars said in the days after the crash: Uber’s cars are loaded with sensors and cameras that should have detected a pedestrian with plenty of time to stop," added Wakabayashi.
But this one failed through a combination of a computer system not responding properly to the pedestrian’s presence and a distracted safety driver.
Video not conclusive
"Based on the entire investigation, this Office has concluded that the collision video, as it displays, likely does not accurately depict the events that occurred," states the letter [pdf] from the Yavapai County Attorney's office.
"Bryant Walker Smith, a University of South Carolina law professor whose research focuses on automated driving systems, suggests not reading too much into the prosecutor's letter," reports Laurel Wamsley for NPR.
"It's not necessarily exculpatory — it doesn't exonerate Uber or put the company's conduct then or now beyond criticism," he writes in an email to NPR. "And I'm not sure it tells us much about the criminal, much less civil, liability of automated driving developers in future incidents."
Hat tip to Streetsblog California.
- United States
- Government / Politics
- Maricopa County
- Yavapai County
- Automatic Braking
- Autonomous Vehicles
- Crash Avoidance
- Cyclists/Pedestrian Crashes
- distracted driving
- Law Enforcement
- Pedestrian Fatalities
- National Transportation Safety Board
- University of South Carolina
- Elaine Herzberg
- Bryant Walker Smith
- Daisuke Wakabayashi
- Laurel Wamsley
- Mihir Zaveri