Investigation Reveals the Failures of 'Clean Coal'
Tim McLaughlin reports the findings of a Reuters investigation into the outcomes of federal programs to subsidize chemically treated clean coal, or "clean coal" in industry public relations terminology.
Refined coal has a "dirty secret," according to McLaughlin: it fails to live up to its environmental promises.
Reuters analyzed U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, including data from a Duke Energy Corp power plant in North Carolina, and found that NOx emission rates increased substantially when the plant began burning refined coal in 2012. When the plant stopped using the refined coal, bromide levels in the region fell sharply.
The story of Duke Energy's Marshall Steam Station power plant in Sherrills Ford, North Carolina is only a case study. In aggregate, according to the analysis, refined coal "shows few signs of reducing NOx emissions as lawmakers intended."
Topics
- A Euclid Dissent
- D.C. Will Say Goodbye to RFK Stadium
- 28,000 Homes Planned for Desert Southeast of Tucson
- Google's San Jose Transit Village Plans Revealed
- The Varied Career of a Transit Service Planner
- The Life and Death of Neighborhood Rebrandings
- 150 Acres of Undeveloped Land to Become 2,350 Homes Outside Denver
- California to Las Vegas High-Speed Rail: Expected for Construction in 2020
- Anti-Development Forces Strike at L.A.'s Transit Oriented Communities Program
- New York City 'More Congested Than Ever'
- Lessons in Tax Increment Financing
- Seattle Ponders Improvements to Ballard Bridge for All Modes of Transport
- L.A. Unveils Plans for Historic Water Infrastructure Tax
- France's Transit Ridership Booms as the USA's Busts
- Your County May Not be Very Good at Accessing Community Development Funding
- Toronto's New Affordable Housing Program Yields 651 New Units
- The High Cost of Cool Air
- After Rash of Pedestrian Deaths, Texas Looks to Create Safety Initiative
- Fewer Bus Stops in Pittsburgh
- Batteries Replacing Horses in the Carriage Industry
