Investigation Reveals the Failures of 'Clean Coal'
Tim McLaughlin reports the findings of a Reuters investigation into the outcomes of federal programs to subsidize chemically treated clean coal, or "clean coal" in industry public relations terminology.
Refined coal has a "dirty secret," according to McLaughlin: it fails to live up to its environmental promises.
Reuters analyzed U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, including data from a Duke Energy Corp power plant in North Carolina, and found that NOx emission rates increased substantially when the plant began burning refined coal in 2012. When the plant stopped using the refined coal, bromide levels in the region fell sharply.
The story of Duke Energy's Marshall Steam Station power plant in Sherrills Ford, North Carolina is only a case study. In aggregate, according to the analysis, refined coal "shows few signs of reducing NOx emissions as lawmakers intended."
Topics
- The Sweet Smell of Density? Subconscious Influences on Perceptions of Urban Form
- Austin, Texas Shows the Way to Plan and Design Transit Oriented Development
- $1.5 Billion in BUILD Grants Announced
- Where Campus Planning Meets Urban Planning
- All of L.A.'s Rail Lines Will Get New Names
- Thumbs Down to Planning Rules of Thumb
- Trump Administration Gives 'Opportunity Zones' a Push Forward
- The Future of the Retail Landscape
- Songs About Places - 2018
- Public Transportation Is Good for Kids
- What’s the Life Expectancy in Your Neighborhood?
- Revenue From Oregon Bike Tax Falling Short of Expectations
- Report: Walking to Work Pays Off for the Economy
- Pittsburgh's New Housing Opportunity Fund in Action
- After East Boston Toll Booths Were Automated, Some Miss the Old Way
- Proposed Law Would Empower Section 8 Voucher Users
- San Diego Water Recycling Project Receives Critical EPA Loan
- Oregon to Consider Statewide Ban of SIngle-Family Zoning
- Downtown St. Paul Loop Back in the Gold Line BRT Plan
- EU Commission 'License to Pollute' overturned by top European court
