Should Planners Run for Public Office?

In an opinion piece bemoaning the passage of legislation that gives the BART board new land use planning authority, BART Director Deborah Allen argues that planners won't make good directors because they lack independence.

3 minute read

October 12, 2018, 11:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


Peeradach Rattanakoses / Shutterstock

After California's controversial Senate Bill 827 died last April, another bill that dealt with the preemption of local land use authority received more attention, particularly from the East Bay cities where it would apply.

The ink of Gov. Jerry Brown's signature on Assembly Bill 2923: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District: transit-oriented development had barely dried before Bay Area leaders expressed concerns about giving zoning authority to the BART board, even if only applied to its own parking lots.

One of the more interesting opinions was from BART Board of Directors member Debora Allen, whose district covers stations in the Contra Costa County cities of Concord, Lafayette, Pleasant Hill, and Walnut Creek.

The "legislation giving BART directors zoning authority on the vacant land and parking lots surrounding suburban stations represents a public policy setback for California," writes Allen on Oct. 10 for the East Bay Times. "Cities no longer have authority over things like building height, density, parking replacement and low-income housing ratios."

Readers may find it surprising that the bill, authored by Assemblymembers David Chiu (D-San Francisco) and Timothy S. Grayson (D-Concord) to address the region's housing shortage, was not sponsored by the nine-member elected BART Board of Directors.

In a Sept. 30 statement on BART's new land use authority, BART General Manager Grace Crunican writes that "the BART Board of Directors took an official 'neutral' stance" on the bill, adding:

BART's aim is to partner with the community to build 20,000 new housing units at its stations by the year 2040, and to ensure that at least 35% are affordable.

In her column, Allen singles out professionals in land use planning and related fields, casting a rather wide net, that BART directors need be wary of.

BART directors now and in the future must be capable of making decisions that consider the specific economic needs of each community, without the undue influence of urban planners, land-use consultants, developers, builders, architects, engineers and unions.

It's not just BART directors, though, that should be concerned about the influence of professionals with land use planning expertise, adds Allen. Voters should be as well.

Given the new control handed the regionally elected nine-member BART board, it is more important than ever that we elect directors who can demonstrate their independence from special interests.

Those who already feared the flow of special interest money into BART elections now have cause for greater concern as outside interests try to influence directors suddenly given new power. This November, there are four career urban planners or land-use consultants running for BART director, one in each of the four districts on the ballot

There is some irony to Allen's singling out of planners when the profession, as represented by the California Chapter of the American Planning Association, actually opposed the bill.

Much like Sen. Scott Wiener's SB 827 (which apparently will be reintroduced next year), AB 2923 has elicited strong reactions from policymakers and others concerned about urban issues. On the opposite side of the spectrum, Steven Falk, city manager of Lafayette for the last 22 years, cited the city council's opposition to the bill as having factored into his retirement announced last month.

Hat tip to Bill Murray for his perceptive comment.

Wednesday, October 10, 2018 in East Bay Times

View of Interstate 205 bridge over Columbia River with Mt. Hood in background.

The Unceremonious Death of a Freeway Expansion Project

The end of an Oregon freeway project didn't get much fanfare, but the victory is worth celebrating.

September 19, 2023 - Streetsblog USA

A derelict sign on a barbed wire fence reads “Golf Course, Private, No Admittance.”

Converting Golf Courses to Housing Never as Easy as the Market Would Like

Thousands of golf courses have closed in recent years, but the obvious redevelopment opportunity represented by many defunct courses isn’t always easy to realize.

September 19, 2023 - The Business Journals

Close-up of red Houston BCycle bike share bikes parked at a station

Houston To End Bike Share Program

Lacking the funding it needs to continue, Houston’s BCycle bike share system will end operations in the coming months.

September 18, 2023 - Houston Chronicle

View from inside glass top floor of Amtrak passenger train with Rocky Mountains scenery outside.

Making Colorado’s Front Range Rail a Reality

Local leaders are scrambling to bring together the funding and political support to create new intercity rail service in the fast-growing region.

37 minutes ago - Governing

Students walking on sunny walkway on college campus.

How College Campuses Fulfill an Urbanist Dream

Most college campuses in the United States are inherently walkable, mixing various uses with diverse housing options and transit networks.

1 hour ago - The Daily

Aerial view of Interstate 35 with blurred traffic and Austin, Texas skyline in background with river in foreground at nighttime.

Austin in Race Against Time to Secure Freeway Cap Funding

With a major freeway expansion project looming, the Texas capital is seeking federal funding to build several freeway ‘decks’ downtown.

2 hours ago - Austin American-Statesman

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.