The five-year transportation reauthorization known as the FAST Act relies on $70 billion of one-time, non-user fees to fund the $302 billion bill. The act also allows the government to fund the development of sustainable funding options by states.
Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), ranking member of the House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure, and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), ranking member of the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, "said in a letter to Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx that states should begin experimenting with new infrastructure funding mechanisms now, despite the fact that Congress just passed a five-year, $305 billion highway bill last year," writes Keith Laing for The Hill.
"While the bill [PDF] was fully paid for, it did not resolve long-term solvency challenges of the Highway Trust Fund (HTF)," notes Norton's press release. "To help address this problem, the FAST Act establishes the Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives program, which provides up to $95 million to enable States to test and demonstrate innovative methods to fund needed infrastructure improvements.”
An analysis [PDF] of the FAST Act [see page 14] by the Washington, D.C.-based American Road & Transportation Builders Association lists the program under Transportation Funding Alternatives:
The bill directs the Secretary to make grants to states to demonstrate alternative user-based revenue mechanisms that could maintain the long-term solvency of the HTF. The goal is to test at least two alternative user-based revenue mechanisms and to provide recommendations for adoption and implementation at the federal level.
Funding will be up to $15 million in FY 2016 and $20 million per year thereafter, and the federal share will be 50 percent
"DeFazio and Holmes Norton said Thursday that states should get to work now on finding a replacement for the beleaguered gas tax," writes Laing.
"We believe states are the laboratories of democracy, and the FAST Act provides the necessary funding to incentivize States to explore novel user fee structures that provide sustainable transportation funding."
Hat tip to Mayer Horn via University of Minnesota Congestion Pricing Listserv.
Read the full story: House Dems want states to test gas tax alternatives
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Malls are becoming the midtowns of the future
Mall and office park redevelopments are a generational opportunity to create new nodes of urbanity.
NYC breaks ground on anti-flooding infrastructure project
New York City's new system will reduce stormwater flows to local sewers by 90%.
One Kentucky town’s secret to affordable housing
The Smoketown Community Land Trust has already built seven affordable homes for community members.
Houston gains petal-shaped cooling infrastructure to make streets more ‘delightful’
The city has installed the pavilions along 15 blocks in Houston.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority