Free Transit, But at What Cost?

Opinion: The movement toward fare-free transit might have more to do with optics and politics than planning.

4 minute read

December 14, 2022, 5:00 AM PST

By James Brasuell @CasualBrasuell


Kansas City Bus

David Wilson / Flickr

Washington, D.C. is the latest U.S. city to eliminate fares for public transit riders, after a vote by the D.C. Council on December 6. Connecticut, Seattle, Atlanta, Boulder, and Tucson are among the locations that have extended, implemented, or explored forms of fare-free transit programs in the second half of the calendar year. They follow a host of agencies that launched fare-free transit during the pandemic.

While more evidence of the ridership benefits of fare-free transit emerges along with these new programs (a statewide fare-free program in Colorado boosted ridership during the summer months, for example), it’s a good time for a regularly scheduled reminder that free transit often comes at the cost of improved transit service.

At some point during the pandemic, the transit planning trend du jour became eliminating fares for some or all ridership groups—such programmatic changes far outpacing other potential transit improvements, such as improved stop facilities, protected bus lanes or other street reconfigurations, and increased service levels. It's unclear when the field of planning decided that fare-free transit was the best route to transit success, but that’s the way we are headed.

There are certainly reasons to pause before smashing the fare-free button. Jerusalem Demsas, for example, makes that argument in a recent (paywalled) article for the Atlantic titled “Buses Shouldn’t Be Free.”

Fare-free transit sounds great in theory, but American bus networks are far behind global leaders in offering good service. Focusing on zero-dollar rides is like overseeing a library system stocked solely with out-of-date self-help books in crumbling buildings and wondering if a fresh coat of paint will improve morale.

An article by Peggy Lowe, Ian Duncan, and Justin George for the Washington Post shares the opinions of bus riders around the Washington, D.C. area who admit the savings on fares are appreciated, but perhaps more appreciated would be buses that come more often and get to where there going faster and more efficiently.

While [Tammy] Ward said she likes the financial savings of the free ridership plan, she wishes she could count on the bus to get her to work on time or across the city for shopping or visiting relatives.

The arguments in these two articles are not new—though there are new case studies of agencies and jurisdictions not heeding their warnings. Jarret Walker, one of the nation’s leading consultant on service design and system redesign, has argued a preference for system improvements over fare-free programs, most recently making the Planetizen news feed for this view in 2021. Steven Polzin explained the fiscal impacts of fare reduction programs in a tour de force blog post in 2018.

Washington, D.C. is now the most populous city with fare-free transit in the country (ahead of Kansas City, and Los Angeles’s fare-free transit is currently defunct), and the Washington Post article implies that D.C.’s new program could influence other cities to follow suit.

The remaining question: What’s more beneficial to transit riders—reduced fares or improved transit? It’s important to ask these kinds of questions, but it’s unclear if many cities are. In fact—it’s reasonable to suspect that the reason fare-free transit is so popular is that it avoids hard conversations with the dominant political power when it comes to the use of the public realm in these cities—car drivers. Fare-free transit is happening “behind closed doors”—out of view of the car drivers rushing past as bus riders line up to get onto buses. New bumpouts, protected bus lanes, or signal prioritization—the tools of improved transit service—are much more conspicuous and much more likely to provoke the ire of a gadfly or even a politician.

While there is a good argument to be made for fare-free transit as a tool of equity—especially after seeing transit ridership patters shift to essential workers and low-income communities during and after the pandemic—some of the advocates and sources contributing to these articles in Planetizen, the Washington Post, and the Atlantic are suggesting that equity would be better served by better service.

Like so many other issues, and especially questions of equity, the answer are not as convenient as we might hope.


James Brasuell

James Brasuell, AICP is the former editorial director of Planetizen and is now a senior public affairs specialist at the Southern California Association of Governments. James managed all editorial content and direction for Planetizen from 2014 to 2023, and was promoted from manging editor to editorial director in 2021. After a first career as a class five white water river guide in Trinity County in Northern California, James started his career in Los Angeles as a volunteer at a risk reduction center in Skid Row.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Close-up of "Apartment for rent" sign in red text on black background in front of blurred building

Trump Administration Could Effectively End Housing Voucher Program

Federal officials are eyeing major cuts to the Section 8 program that helps millions of low-income households pay rent.

April 21, 2025 - Housing Wire

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

April 30, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Ken Jennings stands in front of Snohomish County Community Transit bus.

Ken Jennings Launches Transit Web Series

The Jeopardy champ wants you to ride public transit.

April 20, 2025 - Streetsblog USA

Close-up of white panel at top of school bus with "100% electric" black text.

Driving Equity and Clean Air: California Invests in Greener School Transportation

California has awarded $500 million to fund 1,000 zero-emission school buses and chargers for educational agencies as part of its effort to reduce pollution, improve student health, and accelerate the transition to clean transportation.

April 30 - California Air Resources Board

Aerial view of Freeway Park cap park over I-5 interstate freeway in Seattle, Washington at night.

Congress Moves to End Reconnecting Communities and Related Grants

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee moved to rescind funding for the Neighborhood Equity and Access program, which funds highway removals, freeway caps, transit projects, pedestrian infrastructure, and more.

April 30 - Streetsblog USA

"No Thru Traffic - Open Streets Restaurants" sign in New York City during Covid-19 pandemic.

From Throughway to Public Space: Taking Back the American Street

How the Covid-19 pandemic taught us new ways to reclaim city streets from cars.

April 30 - Next City