The Los Angeles Times critiques the political culture in Los Angeles. In this case, it's the failure of a road diet project that provoked the criticism, but these lessons apply to the city's bicycle plans and homeless housing plans, too.
The Los Angeles Times editorial board has responded to a recent round of controversy in Los Angeles over a road diet implemented by the city in the name of traffic safety and then rescinded after complaints from commuters.
"The callousness of some of the commuters complaining about Los Angeles’ attempts to make the streets safer has bordered on satire," begins the editorial in response to the victorious voices in the latest controversy, over a road diet that reduced vehicle lanes on Vista del Mar in the Westside neighborhood of Playa del Rey. "But this is no joke — there is a real possibility that traffic concerns and knee-jerk opposition to change will override good public policy and slow, or even reverse, L.A.’s ambitious plan to dramatically reduce deadly crashes on local streets."
The editorial is at its most pointed when it calls out the leadership of the city for not doing the hard work of implementing the necessary changes to pursue the city's stated Vision Zero and Great Streets initiatives. The editorial calls out Councilmember Gil Cedillo, who recently "introduced a motion that would block any road diet or lane reconfiguration in his district," and Councilmember Paul Krekorian, who recently "sent a Great Streets project in North Hollywood back to the drawing board because he was concerned about removing traffic lanes to make room for protected bike routes."
The editorial also calls out Mayor Eric Garcetti for not continuously making the case for traffic safety—even it means removing vehicle lanes and reducing traffic speeds. That kind of leadership is necessary for any of the city's ambitious plans:
It’s easy for Garcetti and council members to tout their progressive credentials and sign off on ambitious policies to transform L.A. It’s much harder to implement those plans. Too often city leaders fold in the face of opposition. We’ve seen this with the city’s Bicycle Plan. We’ve seen it with homeless housing. And that’s why so many ambitious plans remain unfulfilled.
Read the full story: Selfish motorists are fighting L.A.'s street safety projects. City Hall needs to find the courage to fight back
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
This road in NYC is infamously dangerous — and Mamdani can't fix it
New York City's Ocean Parkway is known for reckless driving, but the power to implement safety measures lies with the state rather than the city.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority